Questions tagged [feynman-diagrams]

A diagrammatic technique introduced by Richard Feynman to describe the quantum behaviour of subatomic particles and their interactions. Do not use for general questions on diagrams that are not of the Feynman kind.

Feynman diagrams were introduced by physicist Richard Feynman in 1948 to represent pictorially the mathematical expressions describing the quantum behaviour of subatomic particles. For example, the following graph represents a Feynman diagram:

feynman diagram

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Feynmann_Diagram_Gluon_Radiation.svg

Here, an electron and a positron annihilate, producing a photon (represented by the blue sine wave) that becomes a quark-antiquark pair, after which the antiquark radiates a gluon (represented by the green helix).

Introduction.

Feynman diagrams were introduced as a diagrammatic technique to keep track of the different terms that appear in the perturbative expansion of certain transition amplitudes in quantum mechanics. A primitive version of the technique was already being used by Stückelberg in his analysis of covariant perturbation theory, but the systematisation and popularisation of the method was a task undertaken by Feynman.

The problem was the following: given a Hamiltonian $H$ that describes a certain system, one wishes to compute its spectrum. To this end, it can be proven that it suffices to calculate the so-called propagation amplitude: $$ \langle q;t|q';t'\rangle=\langle q|\mathrm e^{iH(t-t')}|q'\rangle $$ where $q,q'$ are position eigenstates. In general, the Hamiltonian $H$ cannot be explicitly diagonalised (being a very complicated problem), so one contents oneself with approximating its spectrum in . The procedure is typically the following: we assume that we can write $H=H_0+V$, where $H_0$ is a Hamiltonian whose spectrum is known, and where $V$ is small (say, in the sense that it is multiplied by a small coupling constant). In this situation, the perturbative expansion of $\langle q;t|q';t'\rangle$ can be written schematically as $$ \langle q;t|q';t'\rangle\sim K_0+K_0VK_0+K_0VK_0VK_0+\cdots $$ where $K_0(q,t;q',t')\equiv \langle q|\mathrm e^{iH_0(t-t')}|q'\rangle$ is the of $H_0$, and each term represents a symbolic expression that contains iterated integrals of $K_0$ and $\langle q|V|q'\rangle$. In practice, the computation of the different terms in this series expansion can become very cumbersome very fast.

In his work, and inspired by some remarks made by Dirac, Feynman introduced a new formalism that we now call the formalism (or functional-integral for more generality). Using this new tool, Feynman was able to write down an algorithm to compute the transition amplitude $\langle q;t|q';t'\rangle$ as a power series expansion in the coupling constant. The algorithm had the advantage over old-school methods in that it was explicitly covariant and much more efficient (in that it avoided redundant terms that only differ in the name of the dummy variables). The path-integral offered an alternative expression for the transition amplitude: $$ \langle q,t|q',t'\rangle\equiv\int \mathrm e^{-i\int (H(\tau)-p(\tau)\dot q(\tau))\mathrm d\tau}\ \mathrm dq\;\mathrm dp $$ which, when expanded in a power series in $V$, leads to the exact same terms as the old-school approach.

The path-integral was a completely new mathematical object, which was regarded with some skepticism and unfamiliarity by Feynman's peers. Dyson was able to prove that the technique was nevertheless completely equivalent to the old-school methods, which helped convince the community of the convenience of the new approach. For this reason, the diagrammatic technique is sometimes referred to as the Feynman-Dyson expansion.

In any case, either directly from the path-integral or following the old-school method, the perturbative expansion of the transition amplitude can be written as a power series in the coupling constants, where each term consists of a combination of propagators and powers of $V$. Feynman organised the expansion in graphical terms as follows: each propagator is associated with a line, and each factor of $V$ to a vertex. To compute the transition amplitude to a given order, one draws all graphs with that many vertices and connects them using lines. From the graph, one can read, by means of a certain set of rules, what is the value of the term in the perturbative expansion. A collection of different Feynman diagrams can be found on the Wikimedia page on Feynman diagrams.

Field theory.

An advantage of the path-integral approach is that its generalisation from standard to is rather straightforward. What's more, as the path-integral is naturally written in terms of the action of the system rather than its Hamiltonian, the framework deals easily with Lorentz invariance, making it the most convenient tool to study relativistic quantum mechanics and . Nevertheless, the framework is also convenient in the study of non-relativistic field systems, as in .

1768 questions
49
votes
5 answers

Do virtual particles actually physically exist?

I have heard virtual particles pop in and out of existence all the time, most notable being the pairs that pop out beside black holes and while one gets pulled away. But wouldn't this actually violate the conservation of energy?
32
votes
1 answer

Software for calculating Feynman Diagrams

Is there a software (open source preferred) where I would input something like "Ingoing: a fermion $(p1, s1)$ and a photon $(p2, s2)$. Output: A fermion $(k1, r1)$ and a photon $(k2, r2)$" and I would could then get each diagram (that is, each term…
31
votes
3 answers

Use my example to explain why loop diagram will not occur in classical equation of motion?

We always say that tree levels are classical but loop diagrams are quantum. Let's talk about a concrete example: $$\mathcal{L}=\partial_a \phi\partial^a \phi-\frac{g}{4}\phi^4+\phi J$$ where $J$ is source. The equation of motion is $$\Box \phi=-g…
30
votes
3 answers

Gentle introduction to twistors

When reading about the twistor uprising or trying to follow a corresponding Nima talk, it always annoys me that I have no clue about how twistor space, the twistor formalism, or twistor theory works. First of all, are these three terms some kind of…
28
votes
1 answer

Interpretation of derivative interaction term in QFT

I am trying to understand what a term like $$ \mathcal{L}_{int} = (\partial^{\mu}A )^2 B^2 $$ with $A$ and $B$ being scalar fields for instance means. I understand how to draw an interaction term in Feynman diagrams without the derivative and how to…
AnSy
  • 902
  • 1
  • 7
  • 16
28
votes
1 answer

Systematic way to draw all inequivalent Feynman diagrams

I am wondering whether there is some systematical approach to find Feynman diagrams for S-matrix (or to be more precise for $S-1$ since I am interested in scattering amplitude). For example in $\phi^3$ theory and its variations (e.g. $\phi^2\Phi$)…
28
votes
5 answers

Can Feynman diagrams be used to represent any perturbation theory?

In Quantum Field Theory and Particle Physics we use Feynman diagrams. But e.g. in Schwartz's textbook and here it is shown that it applies to more general cases like general perturbation theory for differential equations. Can Feynman diagrams be…
Wolpertinger
  • 11,787
  • 4
  • 42
  • 94
28
votes
3 answers

How to count and 'see' the symmetry factor of Feynman diagrams?

Could somebody explain how one can derive the symmetry factor both by counting possible contractions and by looking at the symmetry of a diagram. Consider for example this diagram in $\phi^4$-theory with $\mathcal{L}_\text{int} =…
Janosh
  • 1,294
27
votes
3 answers

The path integral and Feynman diagrams

This question is somewhat of a historical one, but it also contains some physics. I am curious to find how exactly the concept of Feynman diagrams arose (I assume from Feynman's path integral)? The leap from path integrals to diagrammatic…
26
votes
3 answers

Problem understanding the symmetry factor in a Feynman diagram

I am trying to understand a $1/2$ in the symmetry factor of the "cactus" diagram that appears in the bottom of page 92 In Peskin's book. This is the diagram in question (notice that we are in $\phi^4$ theory) In the book it is claimed that the…
25
votes
1 answer

If renormalization scale is arbitrary, why do we care about running couplings?

For the bounty please verify the following reasoning [copied from comment below] Ah right, so the idea is that overall observable quantities must be independent of the renormalization scale. But at each order in perturbation theory the result can…
Edward Hughes
  • 8,094
  • 3
  • 48
  • 82
24
votes
1 answer

'Quantum' vs 'Classical' effects in Quantum Field Theory

After reading a few textbooks on Quantum Field Theory there's something that's always struck me as bizarre. Take a scattering process in QED like $\gamma$,e$^-$ $\rightarrow$ $\gamma$,e$^-$. The leading order contribution to this process starts at…
24
votes
1 answer

How can the Feynman rules be read off the Lagrangian?

I am reading Peskin. In his functional methods chapter he says that (i) "Once the quadratic terms in the Lagrangian are properly understood" and (ii) "The propagators of the theory are computed" then "the vertices can be read directly from the…
24
votes
2 answers

Non-Perturbative Feynman diagrams?

The Wikipedia page for Feynman Diagrams claims that Thinking of Feynman diagrams as a perturbation series, nonperturbative effects like tunnelling do not show up, because any effect that goes to zero faster than any polynomial does not affect the…
23
votes
3 answers

Why don't very high order Feynman diagrams contribute significantly?

In a particle physics lecture I had today it was stated that the magnetic moment, $g$, is not quite equal to 2, and the difference is accounted for by QED. Later it was stated that we can see this because as well as first-order decays, there are…
1
2 3
99 100