Questions tagged [quantum-mechanics]

Quantum mechanics describes the microscopic properties of nature in a regime where classical mechanics no longer applies. It explains phenomena such as the wave-particle duality, quantization of energy, and the uncertainty principle and is generally used in single-body systems. Use the quantum-field-theory tag for the theory of many-body quantum-mechanical systems.

When to Use The Tag

Use the tag when asking questions about small quantum mechanical systems, such as a single hydrogen atom, or general aspects of quantum mechanics, e.g., the uncertainty principle, the wave-particle duality, or simple scattering. Use when asking questions about many-body quantum mechanical systems. In most cases, there is no need to tag a question as both and .

Introduction

Single-body quantum mechanics is usually done in a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ of states, where the Bra-Ket notation is used. $|\Psi\rangle$ refers to an element of $\mathcal{H}$ and $\langle \Psi |$ to an element of the dual, $\mathcal{H}^\star$. The state of a physical system corresponds to a ray in $\mathcal H$, that is, to the equivalence class of all vectors $|\Psi\rangle$ that differ by a phase. In this sense, the physics of a quantum mechanical system is realized on a Projective Hilbert space. Two vectors related by $|\Psi'\rangle=\mathrm e^{i\theta}|\Psi\rangle$ correspond to the same physical state.

The projection of a vector $|\Psi\rangle$ onto a particular basis gives a wave function in this basis, cf. . For example, the wave function associated to the state $|\Psi\rangle$ in the basis $|\vec r\rangle$ is $$\langle \vec r | \Psi(t) \rangle = \Psi(\vec r,t).$$

In standard treatments of Quantum Mechanics, one often introduces the notion of a generalized vector, an example being $\langle \vec r|$. This vector has no representation in terms of an actual function, but in terms of a generalized function instead of a Dirac delta. Such an object is not normalizable, and it is more properly understood as an element of a rigged Hilbert space.

Operators, such as $\hat x$ and $\hat p$, are then defined to act on these states. Use the tag whenever your question focuses on this aspect of Quantum Mechanics.

The most prominent example of an operator is the Hamiltonian $\hat H$, which by definition determines the time evolution of the system. This operator has the possible energies of the system as eigenvalues. The eigenvalue equation of the Hamilton operator $\hat H$ is the so-called time-independent (sometimes referred to as TISE):

$$ \hat H |\Psi\rangle = E |\Psi \rangle.$$

While the Hilbert space $\mathcal H$ is, in general, a complex vector space (so that wave-function $\Psi(\vec r,t)$ can be complex), operators that correspond to physical observables ($\hat x$, $\hat p$, $\hat H$) must have real eigenvalues and real expectation values, implying that these operators are Hermitian. In other words, for any pair of states $i,j$ the matrix elements of $\hat A$ satisfy $$ \langle i|\hat A^{\dagger}|j\rangle =\langle j|\hat A|i\rangle^*=\langle i|\hat A|j\rangle$$ where the first equality holds by definition of $\dagger$, and the second one by definition of Hermitian.

The act of applying a projection operator onto the eigenspace of a hermitian operator, such as $\hat x$, on a state $|\Psi\rangle$ is taken to be equal to a measurement on the system described by $|\Psi\rangle$. The eigenvalue of the corresponding eigenspace is then the ‘measured’ value (in this case, the particle's position). Most of these operators relate to classical mechanical operators by the correspondence principle.

Equations of Motion

In the beginning, operators are usually taken to be constant, whereas the states $|\Psi\rangle$ evolve in time. This is known as the Schrödinger picture, and its time evolution is governed by the :

$$ i \hbar \frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d t} |\Psi(t)\rangle = \hat H | \Psi(t) \rangle .$$

An equivalent view is the Heisenberg picture, where states $|\Psi\rangle$ are assumed to be constant, and operators evolve in time according to

$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t} \hat A(t) = \frac{i}{\hbar} [ \hat H , \hat A(t) ] + \frac{\partial}{\partial t} A(t) .$$ where $[\cdot,\cdot]$ stands for .

A third alternative is to consider the so-called Interaction picture (sometimes, Dirac picture). This picture is the most convenient one to formulate , which deals with the task of systematically approximating observables to any desired degree of precision.

Path integral

Another equivalent formulation of Quantum Mechanics is the so-called Path Integral Formulation (or Feynman Formulation), which is as described in .

In the Path Integral formulation a functional called the phase is associated with each path $x=x(t)$:

$$\phi[x] = A \mathrm e^\frac{iS[x]}{\hbar} $$ where $S[x]$ is the action functional associated with a classical system.

The Kernel or the Matrix Element is the path integral of this phase.

$$K(x_1,x_2;t_1-t_2) =\int\phi[x]\ \mathcal{D}x $$
where the integral is over all paths that satisfy $x(t_i)=x_i$, with $i=1,2$.

The wavefunction, finally, is given by:

$$\Psi(x,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} K(x,x',t-t')\Psi(x',t')\ \mathrm{d}x' $$ which is essentially a convolution.

The path integral formulation of Quantum Mechanics makes the emergence of classical mechanics particularly transparent. In a heuristic sense, one notices that paths differing by a small amount $\delta x$ will lead to actions differing by a small amount $\delta S$. If $\delta S\gg\hbar$, then these paths will add destructively, which means that in the classical limit $\hbar\to 0$, only those paths that make the action stationary, $\delta S=0$, will be relevant to the path integral. Thus, the classical path, which satisfies the classical equations of motion, is naturally singled out.

Prerequisites to learn Quantum Mechanics:

Phys: Newtonian Mechanics; Classical Mechanics; Hamiltonian formalism.

Math: Linear algebra; Fourier Transformation; Partial Differential Equations (PDE); Operator Theory and Hilbert spaces; Lie algebras. Maybe also: Finite Groups, Discrete Groups, Lie Groups, and their representation theory; Young Tableaux.

Popular Textbooks

Here are questions about references in quantum mechanics (taken from this question)

32257 questions
217
votes
16 answers

Why don't electrons crash into the nuclei they "orbit"?

I'm having trouble understanding the simple "planetary" model of the atom that I'm being taught in my basic chemistry course. In particular, I can't see how a negatively charged electron can stay in "orbit" around a positively charged nucleus.…
orome
  • 5,209
169
votes
11 answers

What makes a theory "Quantum"?

Say you cook up a model about a physical system. Such a model consists of, say, a system of differential equations. What criterion decides whether the model is classical or quantum-mechanical? None of the following criteria are valid: Partial…
166
votes
7 answers

A list of inconveniences between quantum mechanics and (general) relativity?

It is well known that quantum mechanics and (general) relativity do not fit well. I am wondering whether it is possible to make a list of contradictions or problems between them? E.g. relativity theory uses a space-time continuum, while quantum…
158
votes
1 answer

What is an "attosecond pulse", and what can you use it for?

The 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics was announced today, and it was awarded to Pierre Agostini, Ferenc Krausz and Anne L’Huillier, for “experimental methods that generate attosecond pulses of light for the study of electron dynamics in matter”. The…
150
votes
7 answers

Why do people categorically dismiss some simple quantum models?

Deterministic models. Clarification of the question: The problem with these blogs is that people are inclined to start yelling at each other. (I admit, I got infected and it's difficult not to raise one's electronic voice.) I want to ask my question…
G. 't Hooft
  • 5,521
141
votes
8 answers

What is $\Delta t$ in the time-energy uncertainty principle?

In non-relativistic QM, the $\Delta E$ in the time-energy uncertainty principle is the limiting standard deviation of the set of energy measurements of $n$ identically prepared systems as $n$ goes to infinity. What does the $\Delta t$ mean, since…
133
votes
8 answers

Does a particle exert force on itself?

We all have elaborative discussion in physics about classical mechanics as well as interaction of particles through forces and certain laws which all particles obey. I want to ask, does a particle exert a force on itself? EDIT– Thanks for the…
127
votes
10 answers

How is a quantum superposition different from a mixed state?

According to Wikipedia, if a system has $50\%$ chance to be in state $\left|\psi_1\right>$ and $50\%$ to be in state $\left|\psi_2\right>$, then this is a mixed state. Now, consider the state…
126
votes
8 answers

Is the universe fundamentally deterministic?

I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this question. I realise that this maybe a borderline philosophical question at this point in time, therefore feel free to close this question if you think that this is a duplicate or inappropriate for…
126
votes
14 answers

QM without complex numbers

I am trying to understand how complex numbers made their way into QM. Can we have a theory of the same physics without complex numbers? If so, is the theory using complex numbers easier?
Zeus
  • 3,543
125
votes
10 answers

Why is quantum entanglement considered to be an active link between particles?

From everything I've read about quantum mechanics and quantum entanglement phenomena, it's not obvious to me why quantum entanglement is considered to be an active link. That is, it's stated every time that measurement of one particle affects the…
124
votes
1 answer

Experimental test of the non-statisticality theorem?

Context: The paper On the reality of the quantum state (Nature Physics 8, 475–478 (2012) or arXiv:1111.3328) shows under suitable assumptions that the quantum state cannot be interpreted as a probability distribution over hidden variables. In the…
123
votes
15 answers

Why can't $ i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}$ be considered the Hamiltonian operator?

In the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, $ H\Psi = i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi,$ the Hamiltonian operator is given by $$\displaystyle H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V.$$ Why can't we consider $\displaystyle…
Revo
  • 17,504
123
votes
6 answers

Trace of a commutator is zero - but what about the commutator of $x$ and $p$?

Operators can be cyclically interchanged inside a trace: $${\rm Tr} (AB)~=~{\rm Tr} (BA).$$ This means the trace of a commutator of any two operators is zero: $${\rm Tr} ([A,B])~=~0.$$ But what about the commutator of the position and momentum…
Joe
  • 3,554
119
votes
11 answers

Is Angular Momentum truly fundamental?

This may seem like a slightly trite question, but it is one that has long intrigued me. Since I formally learned classical (Newtonian) mechanics, it has often struck me that angular momentum (and generally rotational dynamics) can be fully derived…
1
2 3
99 100