Questions tagged [hawking-radiation]

Radiation seen by static observers due to quantum effects in close vicinity to a black hole, leading to the potential for eventual evaporation of black holes. Pictorially, a particle-antiparticle pair is created, with one falling through the horizon, becoming causally lost to the rest of the universe, while its neighbor escapes the gravitational potential. Originally predicted by S. Hawking in the 1970s using quantum field theory in curved spacetime.

Brief Summary

Hawking radiation, or Hawking effect, is a prediction of . Within the framework of QFTCS, particles are not fundamental entities of the theory, but rather a concept that emerges in certain situations as excitations of a quantum field. As a consequence, the notion of particle is observer-dependent, and it highly depends on symmetry considerations, such as the existence of a notion of time-translation symmetry. In the 1970s, S. W. Hawking showed that due to these effects, a black hole that was formed after gravitational collapse (for example, at the death of a star) will be perceived by static observers as emitting a thermal spectrum of particles, with temperature being given, up to a multiplicative constant, by the black hole's surface gravity.

Black Hole Thermodynamics

Before Hawking's discovery, it was already known that predicted that obeyed mechanical laws extremely similar to the ordinary laws of , but the analogy between these results was handled with care. In the analogy, the temperature would be analogous to the surface gravity, the entropy would be analogous to the black hole's surface area, the energy would be analogous to the mass, and so on. The analogy seemed interesting due to the fact that the equations were quite similar, and some of the quantities would be the exact relativistic counterpart of the thermodynamical quantities (for example, a black hole's mass is literally its energy within the framework of GR). However, in the classical theory, it makes no sense to speak of a black hole with any non-vanishing temperature since nothing can escape out of a black hole and, as a consequence, it would never be possible for it to reach thermal equilibrium with an external bath, for example.

However, the prediction of Hawking radiation has shown that the surface gravity, which before was seen as only analogous to temperature, was literally the black hole's temperature once quantum effects were taken into account. This conclusion made the analogy between the Laws of Black Hole Mechanics and the Laws of Thermodynamics much more serious since it suggests they might be different expressions of the very same physical principles. More specifically, it suggests that the Mechanical Laws are, simply, the ordinary laws of Thermodynamics applied to a black hole system. This gave birth to what is today known as Black Hole Thermodynamics.

Unruh Effect

A related but different prediction of QFTCS is the . Suppose the quantum field is perceived by an inertial observer as being in the vacuum state. Accelerated observers on Minkowski spacetime perceive the same physical state as being a thermal state at a temperature proportional to their acceleration. Similarly to the Hawking effect, one notices the observer-dependence of the notion of particles.

However, it should also be pointed out that the effects are different: in the Hawking effect, one assumes a static observer on a spacetime which is undergoing gravitational collapse. Before the collapse, the observer sees no particles. After the collapse, the observer sees the black hole emitting particles on a thermal spectrum. On the Unruh effect, on the other hand, one considers an observer undergoing constant acceleration. They have always seen a thermal spectrum of particles and will always see it. Hence, the Hawking effect predicts that the observer will see particles being created, while the Unruh effect predicts the observer will see as if the particles have always been there. Furthermore, while the Hawking effect predicts the particles will be seen as coming from the black hole, the Unruh effect predicts the particles will be seen as coming from all around the observer.

Introductory Resources

Most textbooks that deal with Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetimes will discuss the Hawking effect. Some standard references are

659 questions
161
votes
3 answers

Why does Stephen Hawking say black holes don't exist?

Recently, I read in the journal Nature that Stephen Hawking wrote a paper claiming that black holes do not exist. How is this possible? Please explain it to me because I didn't understand what he said. References: Article in Nature News: Stephen…
66
votes
5 answers

Would touching a black hole of a small mass (the mass of an apple) cause you to spiral in and get dead?

I know that a typical stellar black hole would spaghettify someone who crosses its event horizon. Is this also true for a hypothetical tiny black hole with a small mass (the mass of an apple)? Would someone touching such a black hole spiral into it…
66
votes
4 answers

From where (in space-time) does Hawking radiation originate?

According to my understanding of black hole thermodynamics, if I observe a black hole from a safe distance I should observe black body radiation emanating from it, with a temperature determined by its mass. The energy from this radiation comes from…
N. Virgo
  • 35,274
57
votes
6 answers

Why is matter-antimatter asymmetry surprising, if asymmetry can be generated by a random walk in which particles go into black holes?

My understanding is the early universe was a very "hot" (ie energy dense) environment. It was even hot enough for black holes to form from photons. My second point of understanding is that black holes can lose mass due to hawking radiation, which…
57
votes
2 answers

Is the Hawking radiation of a charged black hole thermal?

Suppose you have a Schwarzschild black hole of mass $M$ and angular parameter $a = 0$ (no rotation). Question: is it possible to throw a charge $Q$ at a faster rate than it will be re-radiated? Will the radiation profile be still thermal? If it is…
53
votes
4 answers

Black holes and positive/negative-energy particles

I was reading Brian Greene's "Hidden Reality" and came to the part about Hawking Radiation. Quantum jitters that occur near the event horizon of a black hole, which create both positive-energy particles and negative-energy particles, produce the…
50
votes
2 answers

Analog Hawking radiation

I am confused by most discussions of analog Hawking radiation in fluids (see, for example, the recent experimental result of Weinfurtner et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 021302 (2011), arXiv:1008.1911). The starting point of these discussions is…
48
votes
3 answers

Why is the information paradox restricted to black holes?

I am reading Hawking's "Brief answers". He complained that black holes destroy information (and was trying to find a way to avoid this). What I don't understand: Isn't deleting information quite a normal process? Doesn't burning a written letter or…
45
votes
3 answers

An explanation of Hawking Radiation

Could someone please provide an explanation for the origin of Hawking Radiation? (Ideally someone who I have been speaking with on the h-bar) Any advanced maths beyond basic calculus will most probably leave me at a loss, though I do not mind a…
41
votes
6 answers

If I fall into an evaporating black hole, where do I end up?

This question has been bothering me for a while. I have a crude hypothesis... As I understand it, an observer falling into a black hole will cross the event horizon at some specific future (proper) time in, and that it will not be a traumatic event…
41
votes
5 answers

Why do physicists trust black hole physics?

Based on popular accounts of modern physics and black holes (articles, video lectures), I have come to understand the following: Black holes are predicted by General Relativity, a classical theory of gravity. We know that the universe is inherently…
38
votes
2 answers

How does one correctly interpret the behavior of the heat capacity of a charged black hole?

Note: Although I have a provided an "answer" to the question, I did not resolve all the questions in this post satisfactorily. I invite anyone willing and able to provide a better answer, which I would be glad to accept instead. Consider the…
32
votes
3 answers

Are electrons just incompletely evaporated black holes?

Imagine a black hole that is fast-approaching its final exponential throws of Hawking evaporation. Presumably, at all points in this end process there will remain a region that identifiably remains "the black hole" until the the very end, as opposed…
31
votes
2 answers

How would a black hole power plant work?

A black hole power plant (BHPP) is something I'll define here as a machine that uses a black hole to convert mass into energy for useful work. As such, it constitutes the 3rd kind of matter-energy power (formerly "nuclear power") humans have…
30
votes
2 answers

Why would a black hole explode?

It is common in popular science culture to assume that Hawking radiation causes black holes to vaporize. And, in the end, the black hole would explode. I also remember it being mentioned in A Brief History of Time. Why would a black hole explode?…
1
2 3
43 44