Questions tagged [qft-in-curved-spacetime]

Quantum field theory in curved spacetime (QFTCS) is a field of study that focuses on problems that arise when considering a quantum field on a fixed, curved spacetime. It allows the study of quantum effects in strong gravitational fields, and has led to many interesting conclusions, such as the Unruh effect and the Hawking effect.

Brief Summary

Relativistic (QFT) is most usually studied in inertial reference frames in Minkowski spacetime, which means it implements the principles of . While this approach is excellent for the study of, e.g., , it does not consider the influence of strong gravitational fields nor allows one to consider what happens in accelerated frames of reference. Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetimes deals with these situations.

The general idea is to weaken the assumptions of Minkowski spacetime in usual QFT and allow for a more general background metric. For example, one might want to study what happens to quantum fields in the proximity of or how they behave once one considers the usual spacetime solutions of . In this sense, QFTCS merges QFT and (GR). However, it should be clear it is not a theory of , since one assumes the background spacetime to be classical.

Many researchers in QFTCS do not believe it to be a fundamental theory, in the sense that they still believe gravity is inherently quantized and, as a consequence, QFTCS is not a complete description of our Universe. However, the framework does allow for a deeper understanding of the interplay between and GR and has led to many interesting conclusions across the years, some of which include the and the prediction of .

Relativity of "Particles"

One of the main results of QFTCS is the fact that the notion of a "particle" is not fundamental, but rather an observer-dependent concept. This is not an issue at all, since quantum field theory is a theory of fields, not of particles.

In summary, particles in QFT are understood as excitations of the fields. To understand excitations as particles, one decomposes the field in Fourier modes and assigns positive-frequency solutions to particles and negative-frequency solutions to anti-particles. While this is a straightforward procedure in usual QFT, QFTCS considers more general spacetimes which not always have enough structure for these sorts of decompositions to be made.

In stationary spacetimes, one can use the notion of frequency associated to the stationary Killing field to decompose the quantum field. In many situations, the need for a choice of a Killing can lead to interesting predictions.

Unruh Effect

As a first example, one might consider the . In Minkowski spacetime, one usually chooses to work with the timelike Killing field corresponding to inertial time. However, on the so-called right Rindler wedge, one can instead choose to work with the timelike Killing field associated with Lorentz boosts. This Killing field is parallel to the orbits of accelerating observers, and hence can be interpreted as the notion of time of these observers.

Suppose then the quantum field is in the inertial vacuum, meaning an inertial observer sees no particles. In this situation, one can also decompose the field in terms of Rindler time, and arrive at the conclusion that the accelerated observers will see a thermal distribution of particles at the Unruh temperature $T_U = \frac{a}{2\pi}$ (where $a$ is the acceleration and we use units with $\hbar = c = 1$) where the inertial observers see none. This prediction exhibits the fact that the notion of particle is observer-dependent.

Hawking Radiation

Another example is the prediction of . Suppose there is a star that collapses to a black hole. If the quantum field on the spacetime was originally on its vacuum state before the collapse happens, a distant, stationary observer will see the black hole emitting particles in a thermal distribution after the collapse happens. The temperature of the thermal distribution is the Hawking temperature, given by $T_H = \frac{\kappa}{2 \pi}$, where $\kappa$ is the surface gravity of the black hole and we employ units with $\hbar = c = G = 1$.

Resources

Some references for QFTCS are

Books

Review Papers

Phys.SE Posts

622 questions
45
votes
3 answers

An explanation of Hawking Radiation

Could someone please provide an explanation for the origin of Hawking Radiation? (Ideally someone who I have been speaking with on the h-bar) Any advanced maths beyond basic calculus will most probably leave me at a loss, though I do not mind a…
38
votes
2 answers

How does one correctly interpret the behavior of the heat capacity of a charged black hole?

Note: Although I have a provided an "answer" to the question, I did not resolve all the questions in this post satisfactorily. I invite anyone willing and able to provide a better answer, which I would be glad to accept instead. Consider the…
34
votes
2 answers

Electric charges on compact four-manifolds

Textbook wisdom in electromagnetism tells you that there is no total electric charge on a compact manifold. For example, consider space-time of the form $\mathbb{R} \times M_3$ where the first factor is time. One defines the total charge via $Q(M_3)…
30
votes
2 answers

Suggested reading for quantum field theory in curved spacetime

I want to learn some QFT in curved spacetime. What papers/books/reviews can you suggest to learn this area? Are there any good books or other reference material which can help in learning about QFT in curved spacetime? There is no restriction about…
25
votes
1 answer

How is the logarithmic correction to the entropy of a non-extremal black hole derived?

I`ve just read, that for non-extremal black holes, there exists a logarithmic (and other) correction(s) to the well known term proportional to the area of the horizon such that $$S = \frac{A}{4G} + K \ln \left(\frac{A}{4G}\right)$$ where $K$ is a…
24
votes
6 answers

What is Hawking radiation and how does it cause a black hole to evaporate?

My understanding is that Hawking radiation isn't really radiated from a black hole, but rather occurs when a particle anti-particle pair spontaneously pop into existence, and before they can annihilate each other, the antiparticle gets sucked into…
23
votes
5 answers

Was Stephen Hawking's explanation of Hawking Radiation in "A Brief History of Time" not entirely accurate?

I've been looking into black holes and Hawking radiation recently (just on the surface level) and was reading "A Brief History in Time" by Stephen Hawking to understand the basics of Hawking radiation. Then I came across a website online which…
22
votes
0 answers

Definition of vacua in QFT in generic spacetimes

I have been learning QFT in curved spaces from various sources (Birrell/Davies, Tom/Parker, some papers), and one thing that confuses me the most is the choice of vacua in various spacetimes, and the definition used in various contexts. They seem to…
21
votes
3 answers

If electrons were just positrons moving backwards in time, then shouldn't we see them coming out of black holes?

I have read this question (What would happen if I crossed the shell of a hollow black hole?): In effect, the formerly spacelike direction inwards becomes timelike, and the singularity is in the future (and just as unavoidable as the future is for…
20
votes
6 answers

Why doesn't Hawking radiation add to the mass of a black hole just as much as it subtracts from it?

If 'quantum foam'-generated particles are made of matter and antimatter in equal amounts, why don't the matter particles that fall into the black hole add to the black hole's mass just as much as the antimatter particles subtract from it? How, then,…
18
votes
2 answers

Physical intuition for the Wilczek-Parikh tunneling picture of Hawking radiation

There's a naive pop-sci explanation of Hawking radiation, where a particle-antiparticle pair is produced just inside the event horizon. The particle with positive energy tunnels out and escapes, while the one with negative energy falls in, so the…
17
votes
4 answers

Why is Hawking radiation composed of photons?

The existence of the event horizon disrupts the vacuum state of quantum fields, and hence it appears to an observer that a black hole is generating radiation in its surroundings. Why is it the electromagnetic field that is perturbed? Why is…
17
votes
2 answers

Existence of the Unruh effect

In the paper Quantum field aspect of Unruh problem (and others with similar approaches) Buchholz and Verch show that applying the rigorous algebraic approach to QFT, the derivation of the Unruh effect usually done by almost everyone is incorrect,…
17
votes
2 answers

Stress-energy tensor for a fermionic Lagrangian in curved spacetime - which one appears in the EFE?

So, suppose I have an action of the type: $$ S =\int \text{d}^4 x\sqrt{-g}( \frac{i}{2} (\bar{\psi} \gamma_\mu \nabla^\mu\psi - \nabla^\mu\bar{\psi} \gamma_\mu \psi) +\alpha \bar{\psi} \gamma_\mu \psi\bar{\psi}\gamma_\nu \psi g^{\mu\nu})$$ Where…
16
votes
2 answers

Can Quantum Field Theory not handle accelerated frames of reference?

Since Quantum Field Theory can't handle gravity, and gravity is mathematically equivalent to acceleration (equivalence principle), does this mean Quantum Field theory can't handle accelerated frames of reference?
1
2 3
41 42