3

I'm trying to solve the Schrodinger equation $$ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 \psi+V(x,y)\psi(x,y)=E\psi(x,y) \tag{1}$$ for the finite two dimensional potential square well, that is, where

$$V(x,y)=\left\{\begin{matrix} 0 & if & \left |x \right |<a/2, \left |y \right |<a/2 \\ V_0 & if & \left |x \right |>a/2, \left |y \right |>a/2 \end{matrix}\right.\tag{2}$$

using separation of variables. My question arise when I make the suposition that $$V(x,y)=V_x(x)+V_y(y)\tag{3}$$ so $$\psi(x,y)=X(x) Y(y)\tag{4}$$

When I apply the separation of variable, I get: $$ \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{X''(x)}{X(x)}+V_x(x)+\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{Y''}{Y}+V_y(y)=E\tag{5} $$ So $$ \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}X''(x)+V_x(x)X(x)=E_x X(x)\tag{6}$$ $$ \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}Y''(y)+V_y(y)Y(y)=E_y Y(y)\tag{7}$$

where $E_x+E_y=E$

What actually happens with $V(x,y)$? Should I suppose that it's 'split' equally between $x$ and $y$? Or it can be 'split' in an arbritrary way? (as long as $V_x(x) + V_y(y) = V(x,y)$)

For example,

  1. inside the well, $V(x,y)=0$, so

    • Could be $V_x(x)=-5.24V_0$ and $V_y(y)=+5.24V_0$? (arbitrary partition)
    • Or should I suppose that $V_x(x)=0$ and $V_y(y)=0$ (equal partition)

  2. outside the well, $V(x,y)=V_0$, so

    • Could be $V_x(x)=\frac{1}{4}V_0$ and $V_y(y)=\frac{3}{4}V_0$? (arbitrary partition)
    • Or should I suppose that $V_x(x)=\frac{1}{2}V_0$ and $V_y(y)=\frac{1}{2}V_0$ (equal partition)

Edit:

This potential can't be solved by separation of variables. See this answer for more info: How to solve bound states of 2D finite rectangular square well?

Community
  • 1
user246185
  • 233

1 Answers1

3

I think there is no adequate answer in the duplicate, so I tell you one way, which I believe resolve this problem.

Try to use a perturbation approach. Consider two one-dimensional finite wells for $x$ and $y$ respectfully, sum them up and take the difference between two-dimensional well, which you want to have, and the potential, which you get from summing two one-dimensional, as a perturbation. I don't remember if the second order perturbation correction coincide with an exact solution, but it is enough to see the degeneracy in energy levels.

Nikolai Miklin
  • 196