Questions tagged [dirac-equation]

A fully relativistic (Lorentz covariant) description, first put forward by Paul Dirac in 1928, of the first quantized, spin one half fermion with nonzero mass. Physical notions to do with this equation include the Dirac sea, Dirac hole theory, the Klein Paradox and the fine structure of the Hydrogen spectrum.

The Dirac equation describes the first quantized, spin one half fermion with nonzero mass in a fully Lorentz covariant way. It is a linear differential equation defining the evolution of a vector of four complex quantities (a bispinor) that transforms in a specific way under a Lorentz transformation. The equation's co-efficients, the so-called gamma matrices, are elements of the Clifford algebra $C\ell_{1,3}(\mathbb{R})$ and indeed generate this algebra. The solutions are superpositions of a fermion and its antiparticle and their collocation in the Dirac bispinor gives rise to the Klein paradox. The Dirac equation explains the fine structure of the Hydrogen spectrum but must be coupled to the electromagnetic field through $\partial_\mu \to\partial_\mu + i q A_\mu$ to explain the Lamb shift and spontaneous emission.

1239 questions
46
votes
7 answers

Why fermions have a first order (Dirac) equation and bosons a second order one?

Is there a deep reason for a fermion to have a first order equation in the derivative while the bosons have a second order one? Does this imply deep theoretical differences (like space phase dimesion etc)? I understand that for a fermion, with half…
38
votes
4 answers

What is the difference between a spinor and a vector or a tensor?

Why do we call a 1/2 spin particle satisfying the Dirac equation a spinor, and not a vector or a tensor?
36
votes
4 answers

Dimension of Dirac $\gamma$ matrices

While studying the Dirac equation, I came across this enigmatic passage on p. 551 in From Classical to Quantum Mechanics by G. Esposito, G. Marmo, G. Sudarshan regarding the $\gamma$ matrices: $$\tag{16.1.2} (\gamma^0)^2 = I , (\gamma^j)^2 = -I \…
27
votes
2 answers

Introduction to spinors in physics, and their relation to representations

First, I shall say that I am familiar with the intuitive idea that a spinor is like a vector (or tensor) that only transforms "up to a sign" when acted on by the rotation group. I have even rotated a plate on my palm to explain this to my fiancee! I…
26
votes
1 answer

Classical Fermion and Grassmann number

In the theory of relativistic wave equations, we derive the Dirac equation and Klein-Gordon equation by using representation theory of Poincare algebra. For example, in this paper http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4942 the Dirac equation in momentum space…
25
votes
1 answer

How did we know that the Dirac equation describes the electron but not the proton?

I'm suddenly getting confused on what should be a very simple point. Recall that the $g$-factor of a particle is defined as $$\mu = \frac{ge}{2m} L$$ where $L$ is the spin angular momentum. For any classical system where the charge and mass…
23
votes
5 answers

Why would Klein-Gordon describe spin-0 scalar field while Dirac describe spin-1/2?

The derivation of both Klein-Gordon equation and Dirac equation is due the need of quantum mechanics (or to say more correctly, quantum field theory) to adhere to special relativity. However, excpet that Klein-Gordon has negative probability issue,…
23
votes
4 answers

What does "Relativistic" mean in Quantum Mechanical Terms?

I was reading recently how the compatibility of quantum mechanics with special relativity was initially a problem for physicists and then Dirac succeeded in formulating a relativistic, quantum-mechanical theory through the Dirac equation. From my…
22
votes
3 answers

Is there an algebraic approach for the topological boundary (defect) states?

There are many free fermion systems that possess topological edge/boundary states. Examples include quantum Hall insulators and topological insulators. No matter chiral or non-chiral, 2D or 3D, symmetry protected or not, their microscopic origins…
Everett You
  • 12,228
  • 44
  • 74
22
votes
3 answers

Is Zitterbewegung an artefact of single-particle theory?

I have seen a number of articles on Zitterbewegung claiming searches for it such as this one: http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.2186. Others such as the so-called ZBW interpretation by Hestenes seemingly propose to explain electron spin as a consequence of…
Whelp
  • 4,176
21
votes
1 answer

Interpretation of Dirac equation states

In Pauli theory the components of two-component wavefunction were interpreted as probability amplitudes of finding the particle in particular spin state. This seems easy to understand. But when talking about Dirac equation, we have four-component…
Ruslan
  • 30,001
  • 8
  • 70
  • 154
21
votes
2 answers

Charge conjugation in Dirac equation

According to Dirac equation we can write, \begin{equation} \left(i\gamma^\mu( \partial_\mu +ie A_\mu)- m \right)\psi(x,t) = 0 \end{equation} We seek an equation where $e\rightarrow -e $ and which relates to the new wave functions to $\psi(x,t)$…
21
votes
3 answers

Interpretation of Dirac equation states for moving electron

I try to understand a physical interpretation of the four components of the Dirac 4-spinor for a moving electron (in the simplest case, a plane wave). There is a very good question and answer about the interpretations already at SE. Basically it is…
21
votes
2 answers

Interpretation of Dirac Spinor components in Chiral Representation?

I failed to find any book or pdf that explains clearly how we can interpret the different components of a Dirac spinor in the chiral representation and I'm starting to get somewhat desperate. This is such a basic/fundamental topic that I'm really…
21
votes
4 answers

Is it true that the Schrödinger equation only applies to spin-1/2 particles?

I recently came across a claim that the Schrödinger equation only describes spin-1/2 particles. Is this true? I realize that the question may be ill-posed as some would consider the general Schrödinger equation to be $$ i\hbar…
1
2 3
82 83