2

My understanding is that a Black Body is a physical body that:

  • Absorbs all incident electromagnetic radiation, regardless of frequency or angle of incidence. This means that its absorptivity is $1$ for all wavelengths ($\alpha(\lambda) = 1$). My interpretation of this is that the absorption spectrum of the black body will match that of the source of the incident radiation, since the black body will absorb all radiation it receives from the source.

  • In thermal equilibrium, it radiates the maximum possible amount of energy for a given temperature, which is given by Planck’s radiation law. This means that its emissivity is $1$ for all wavelengths ($\epsilon(\lambda)=1$). My interpretation of this is that thermal equilibrium for a black body is only possible if the source of incident radiation also follows a Planckian distribution, since a black body in thermal equilibrium can only emit following a Planckian distribution, so if the source is not Planckian the black body emission spectrum will never match the incident radiation spectrum and Kirchoff's Law of thermal radiation ($\alpha(\lambda) = \epsilon (\lambda)$) will never be fulfilled.

Am I correct in these interpretations? In case that I am, would it be possible for an object that has the ability to behave as black body to be in thermal equilibrium with a non-Planckian source by not behaving as a black body so that it can match the source's emission spectrum?

Qmechanic
  • 220,844
Clerni
  • 233

4 Answers4

3

You are wrong. Kirchoff's Law does not require that the emission spectrum will match the incident radiation spectrum.

The requirement $\alpha(\lambda)=\varepsilon(\lambda)$ only requires that at a given wavelength the absorptivity equals the emissivity, meaning that: The quotient defined by the power that is absorbed, divided by what a black body would absorb given the same irradiation, is the same as the quotient defined by the power that is emitted, divided by what a black body would emit given the same temperature. So there are a lot of quantities involved in that sentence, but none of those need be equal, only those two fractions! They must both be given by the same function of wavelength (and possibly temperature).

1

Thanks to @JosBergervoet and @JanLalinsky for the answers, and also to @Ruffolo for the reference to another helpful question. I will present here the understanding I have gathered from these answers and the references provided (plus some others I have looked into), addressing the main confusions fuelling my original question. Anything you see that is incorrect or could be improved, please let me know.

Definition of the Black Body

A black body is an object that allows all incident radiation to enter into its interior and absorbs it completely (no radiation is reflected at the external surface or exits the body after entering into it), regardless of wavelength and angle of incidence. As such, a black body is a perfect absorber for all incident radiation [1].

Furthermore, a black body also diffusely (equally in all angles) emits the maximum possible radiant energy at each wavelength for any body at a particular temperature $T$ [1]. This maximum possible radiant energy at each wavelength and temperature is given by Planck's Law [2].

Absorptivity and Emissivity

Absorptivity

The absorptivity $\alpha(\lambda)$ of a general body is a unitless coefficient defined as the ratio of the power the body absorbs at a specific wavelength to the total incident power.

\[ \alpha(\lambda) = \frac{\text{power absorbed by the body at } \lambda}{\text{total incident power at } \lambda} \]

Since the black body is a perfect absorber, it follows that $\alpha_\text{blackbody} = 1$, $\forall \lambda$. In this way, the power absorbed by a black body can be used as a reference to obtain the absorptivity of other bodies.

\[ \alpha(\lambda) = \frac{\text{power absorbed by the body at } \lambda}{\text{absorbed power at } \lambda \text{ if the body was a black body}} \]

Emissivity

The emissivity $\varepsilon(\lambda)$ of a general body is a unitless coefficient defined as the ratio of the power emitted by the body at a specific wavelength to the maximum possible power emitted by any body at the same temperature as the general body.

\[ \varepsilon(\lambda) = \frac{\text{power emitted by the body at } \lambda}{\text{maximum power emitted by any body at the same temperature at } \lambda} \]

Since the black body is a perfect emitter, it follows that $\varepsilon_\text{blackbody} = 1$, $\forall \lambda$, since it emits the maximum radiant energy that any body can emit for a particular temperature. In this way, the power emitted by a black body can be used as a reference to obtain the emissivity of other bodies.

\[ \varepsilon(\lambda) = \frac{\text{power emitted by the body at } \lambda}{\text{power emitted at }\lambda\text{ by a black body at the same temperature}} \]

Thermodynamic Equilibrium

Bodies in Thermodynamic Equilibrium and Kirchhoff's Law

A body is in thermodynamic equilibrium with its surroundings when it emits the same amount of energy that it absorbs. Thus, there is no net energy exchange between the body and its surroundings, and the body's temperature remains constant.

One consequence of thermodynamic equilibrium is Kirchhoff's Law of Thermal Radiation [3] which, simply put, states that, for an arbitrary body emitting and absorbing thermal radiation in thermodynamic equilibrium, its absorptivity function $\alpha (\lambda)$ and its emissivity function $\varepsilon (\lambda)$ are the equal. In other words, the absorptivity and emissivity of a body in thermal equilibrium are equal at each wavelength, $\alpha (\lambda) = \varepsilon (\lambda)$.

Note that the inverse is not necessarily true: a body such that $\alpha (\lambda) = \varepsilon (\lambda) $, $\forall \lambda$, is not necessarily in thermodynamic equilibrium. A clear example of this is the black body, which always satisfies $\alpha (\lambda) = \varepsilon (\lambda)$ (equal to $1$) but is not necessarily in thermodynamic equilibrium with its surroundings.

Principle of Detailed Balance

Kirchhoff's Law of Thermal Radiation is even stronger than this: not only does it hold macroscopically, but also in detail. This is the Principle of Detailed Balance [4], which states that, in thermodynamic equilibrium, the power radiated and absorbed by a body must be equal for every infinitesimal surface element, in every direction and polarization state, and across every wavelength interval. In other words, consider an infinitesimal surface element, select any direction and polarization state, and choose an infinitesimal wavelength interval. Under thermodynamic equilibrium, the power entering and leaving that element under those conditions must be equal, resulting in zero net power transfer.

This, of course, highlights just how idealized the concept of thermodynamic equilibrium is, as it requires objects to have perfectly matching emission and absorption spectra. For instance, a black body at temperature $T$ can only be in thermodynamic equilibrium when surrounded by other black bodies at the same temperature. In contrast, a black body interacting with a real body could never achieve true thermodynamic equilibrium (even when at the same temperature), since real bodies typically deviate from ideal behavior (they may not follow Planck’s spectrum, may not emit diffusely, or may exhibit polarization characteristics that differ from those of a black body) and so detailed balance would never be achieved.

Thermal Equilibrium without Detailed Balance

In general, a system is only considered to be in thermodynamic equilibrium if it satisfies the condition of detailed balance. However, some systems may be in some kind of equilibrium state, where the net macroscopic power exchanged between different elements of the system is zero, but the principle of detailed balance does not apply. In these cases (restricting our discussion to wavelength) $\alpha (\lambda) = \varepsilon (\lambda) $ is verified but it does not mean that the power absorbed by the body at each wavelength is equal to the power emitted by the body at that same wavelength, but rather that the absorptivity and emissivity functions are equal at each wavelength. In the case of the absorptivity, we are comparing the power absorbed by the body to the total incident power, while in the case of the emissivity, we are comparing the power emitted by the body to the maximum possible power emitted by any body at the same temperature, which is given by Plank's Law:

\[ \text{power absorbed by the body at } \lambda = \alpha (\lambda) \times \text{total incident power at } \lambda \] \[ \text{power emitted by the body at } \lambda = \varepsilon (\lambda) \times \genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{\text{power emitted at }\lambda \text{ by a black body}}{\text{at the same temperature}} \]

Clearly, these two quantities are not necessarily equal, even if $\alpha (\lambda) = \varepsilon (\lambda)$. In fact, the power emitted by the body at a specific wavelength does not depend at all on the distribution of the absorbed power in wavelength, but only on the temperature of the body and its emissivity at that wavelength.

What does need to be equal, however, is the total power absorbed by the body and the total power emitted by the body, which is a consequence of the body being in thermodynamic equilibrium with its surroundings. This is obtained by integrating the power absorbed and emitted over all wavelengths:

\[ P_\text{absorbed} = \int_0^\infty \alpha (\lambda) \times \text{total incident power at } \lambda \text{ } d\lambda \]

\[ P_\text{emitted} = \int_0^\infty \varepsilon (\lambda) \times \genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{\text{power emitted at }\lambda \text{ by a black body}}{\text{at the same temperature}} d\lambda
\]

Equilibrium here implies $P_\text{absorbed} = P_\text{emitted}$.

Conclusions

Here are the main conclusions, that address the original question:

  • A black body is defined as a perfect absorber and emitter of radiation because:

    1. It absorbs all incident radiation.
    2. It emits the maximum amount of radiation that any body at a particular temperature $T$ is able to emit.
  • Absorptivity and emissivity, which describe how real materials interact with thermal radiation, can be defined in terms of the power absorbed/emitted by a black body.

  • Kirchhoff’s Law establishes that for a body in thermodynamic equilibrium, absorptivity and emissivity are equal at each wavelength.

  • The Principle of Detailed Balance states that the power absorbed and emitted by a body must be equal for every infinitesimal surface element, in every direction and polarization state, and across every wavelength interval.

  • Detailed Balance is generally considered a requirement for strict thermodynamic equilibrium, but some systems can be in a macroscopic equilibrium state without satisfying it.

  • Two bodies cannot be in true thermal equilibrium if they do not have the same emission/absorption spectrum, since they would not satisfy the Principle of Detailed Balance.

References

[1] Siegel, R., & Howell, J. R. (2002). Thermal radiation heat transfer; Volume 1 (4th ed.). Taylor & Francis.

[2] Planck, M. (1901). On the law of distribution of energy in the normal spectrum. Annalen der Physik, 4(3), 553–563.

[3] Kirchhoff, G. (1860). On the relation between the radiating and absorbing powers of different bodies for light and heat. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 20(130), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786446008642901

[4] Reif, F. (2009). Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics. United States: Waveland Press.

Clerni
  • 233
0

It is useful to realize that there is the concept of thermodynamic equilibrium, and there is the concept of local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE).

Thermodynamic equilibrium means no macroscopic net flow of energy in or out of any region, and temperature being the same everywhere.

A black body, in general, is not in thermodynamic equilibrium with its surroundings (and it need not be to be a black body). It can be in thermodynamic equilibrium with other body only in a very special situation: when all its surroundings in all directions have the same temperature, and radiates back at the blackbody with the same intensity the blackbody does, at each frequency interval. For example, the blackbody can be enclosed in a cavity in which the same temperature is maintained (energy does not leak out of it, or is resupplied to keep the temperature constant). If there is no such cavity, and the blackbody is interacting just with radiation of some non-Planckian source, the blackbody is not in thermodynamic equilibrium. If these two bodies are enclosed in a well insulating cavity, then the system will move towards thermodynamic equilibrium, even if emission of one of the bodies is not Planckian (so it is not a black body). Reflections of teh established equilibrium radiation will supply the missing intensity that the non-Planckian body is not emitting, compared to a blackbody of same surface and temperature.

Local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) at any point of a system means that a macroscopic element of the system centered at this point need not be in equilibrium with the surrounding elements, and temperature can vary from point to point, but radiation passing through every point is Planckian, with possible position-dependent temperature. This is approximately the case e.g. when an ember radiates and cools down, or when a piece of Sun interior is traversed by radiation in all directions, but net energy is transported radially from center to surface.

A bodies approximating black body are supposed to be in LTE in their inside, because black body is supposed to absorb all incoming radiation in its surface, so the non-Planckian radiation does not reach the interior. But in your example, when non-Planckian source emits radiation some of which is absorbed by the blackbody, the blackbody surface definitely is not in LTE, as radiation there is a combination of Planckian radiation of the blackbody and the non-Planckian radiation of the other body, and so the resulting radiation there is not Planckian.

0

@Clerni A misunderstanding has crept into your question and answer. Your statement

"The true condition for equilibrium is that the total power absorbed equals the total power emitted, which results from integration over all wavelengths."

is too limited. Actually, in a cavity at equibrium (ie: all walls the same temperature T), the flux $F(\lambda)=$power per unit area per wavelength interval into the wall and out of the wall are the same at each wavelength (ie: it is not just the total power in/out is the same).

We jumped to talking about a cavity because a piece of surface at temperature T being in equilibrium with its environment means that in all $2\pi$ steradian solid angle the surface only sees other surfaces at the same temperature T. Thus we are talking about a closed cavity with all the walls at the same temperature T.

Kirchoff (-1860) imagined two cavities, made of different materials, are connected by a small hole with a filter that passes wavelength $\lambda \pm\Delta\lambda$ . The two cavities have both come to the temperature T. The power passing the filter in both directions must be the same or we could use the unbalanced flow of energy to do work. This would violate the second law of thermodynamics by getting useable work from two heat baths at the same temperature. Kirchoff concluded there was a universal spectrum $F(\lambda)$, independent of cavity material (eg: copper, wood, or cotton candy!), that emerged from all cavities, though it was left to Planck to deduce the actual function. You can also conclude that the cavities can't show any peaks due to different surface emissivities or cavity modes. Otherwise, the filter could be set to pass a peak from the first cavity that the second cavity did not have. Power would again pass from a cavity at temperature T and warm a cavity of the same temperature T, violating the second law.

So we replace your original statement with, "At equilibrium the energy flux, in any direction at any location in the cavity (including in/out right in front of a wall), per wave length interval= $F(\lambda)=[\frac{Watts}{Meter^2 \Delta \lambda}]$ is the same function $F(\lambda)$ for all cavities at the same temperature T no matter what the cavities are made of." Many years later, Planck derived $F(\lambda)=BlackBodySpectrum$ by imagining the walls made of harmonic oscillators.

For a bouncing photon argument (rather than Kirchoff) of how the cavity flux is independent of cavity modes please see my answer to another Physics Stack question.

The answer to your title question is: No, if you see any spectrum other than Planck inside a cavity (eg: part of the wall is at a different temperature radiating a different temperature Planck spectrum, part of the wall is an antenna broadcasting power from a signal generator, emission lines in the wall are being excited by a laser) then the cavity is not in thermal equilibrium. Make the cavity adiabatic (insulate it and turn off all external sources of energy). Eventually the walls will all equilibrate at the same temperature T and there will be a pure Planck spectrum in the cavity.

Gary Godfrey
  • 3,428