0

I am doing some revision on theoretical physics, specifically propagator theory. This is talking about how to work out the probability amplitude at some time $t_{f}$ and position $x){f}$, given that we know what happens at $(t,x)$.

Working in natural units, and we can rearrange the Schrodinger equation to get an operator.

$$ i\partial_{t_f} \psi(t_f,x_f) = \hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})\psi(t_f,x_f) $$ $$ [i\partial_{t_f} - \hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})]\psi(t_f,x_f) = 0 $$

and then we can define an operator $\hat{O}$ as: $$ \hat{O}\psi(t_f,x_f) = [i\partial_{t_f} - \hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})]\psi(t_f,x_f) = 0. $$

$\psi$ is arbitrary, therefore we can write $\hat{O}$ as

$$ \hat{O} = [i\partial_{t_f} - \hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})]$$

My question is what I would get if I multiplied $\hat{O}$ with a theta function $\theta(t_{f}-t)$, where $\theta = 1$ for $t_{f} \geq t$ and $\theta = 0$ for $t_{f} < t$

$$\hat{O}\theta(t_{f}-t) = [i\partial_{t_f} - \hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})]\theta(t_{f}-t)$$

I know that since a theta function only changes gradient at $t_{f} = t$, I will get a Dirac-delta function, but what about when it multiplies with $\hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})$

$$i\partial_{t_{f}}\theta(t_{f} - t) = i\delta(t_f - t) $$

$$ - \hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})\theta(t_{f} - t) = ?$$

I want to know this result because solving the propagation equation is done by:

$$ \hat{O}(t_f,x_f)\theta(t_{f} - t)\psi(t_f,x_f) = \int dx [\hat{O}(t_f,x_f) i G(t_f,x_f; t,x)]\psi(t,x) $$

Where G is a Green Function

which is apparently just:

$$i\delta(t_f - t)\psi(t_f,x_f) =\int dx [\hat{O}(t_f,x_f) i G(t_f,x_f; t,x)]\psi(t,x)$$

1 Answers1

1

Indeed, θ commutes with $\hat H$, trivially; isn't that your teacher's point?

The point is that you just commute the θ past $\hat O$ so as to leave the latter annihilate its wavefunction kernel, $$ \hat{O} = [i\partial_{t_f} - \hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})] \qquad \leadsto \\ \hat{O}\theta(t_{f}-t) = [i\partial_{t_f} - \hat{H}(t_{f},x_{f})]\theta(t_{f}-t)\\ = i\delta(t_f - t) +\theta(t_{f}-t)\hat{O}~~, $$ so that $$ \hat{O}(t_f,x_f)\theta(t_{f} - t)\psi(t_f,x_f)= i\delta(t_f - t) \psi(t_f,x_f) \\ =i \int\!\! dx ~~\delta(t_f - t) \delta(x_f - x) \psi(t,x) \\ =\int\!\! dx ~~ [\hat{O}(t_f,x_f) i G(t_f,x_f; t,x)]\psi(t,x) .$$


NB Clarification following comments

You seemed uneasy about the standard formal relation $[∂_{},(_−)]=(_−)$ the whole construction hinges on. It indicates the derivative acts on , but then it survives to further keep on acting on everything else that follows it, including , e.g., , by the chain rule of derivation! That is to say, $$[∂_{},(_−)] = ∂_{}((_−) )- (_−)∂_{} \\ =(_−) .$$

Cosmas Zachos
  • 67,623