I've seen similar questions asked, but I didn't think they were quite the same.
My understanding, and it is probably an incorrect one, is that an electron in an orbital shell has a stable balance of kinetic energy and potential energy. When a photon of the right frequency disturbs this, the electron is lifted to a new shell with a new stable balance between kinetic energy and potential energy.
I would think that this is a new stable situation. Why, then, would an electron ever lose energy and drop back to the old level?
This is, in fact, a unique question on this site. I am not asking about stimulated emission (using bouncing light off the electron to decelerate it). I would prefer an answer to why the vis-viva equations (Hamiltonians) don't apply, so as much as I appreciate answers sending me to databases of Einstein A coefficients, like HITRAN (thank you), this is only the answer to my question in the same way that "because I say so" is an answer to every question.
The closest to what might be an answer (for anyone following behind me) is this Atomic Natural Line Width
Which I haven't finished parsing yet, but my understanding so far is : that the vis-viva (Hamiltonian) equations are only for the atom. And considered this way alone, spontaneous emission would not occur. You need to consider the field effect of other things in the media. These combined have a net slowing effect, generally.
So, thank you for the help finding an answer in other questions in the comments, and thank you to the two people who tried to field an answer before this was question was cut-off barely 24 hours after it was asked by a bunch of people who provided wrong answers only (so far; it's a lot of links to partial answers, which all require more research on my part).
This useless nonsense is why I stopped posting on Stack Exchange and went somewhere helpful like Codidact. Thanks for the reminder!