The question says it all.
How can I best convince a non-physicist that the Boltzmann constant describes the world around us?
Are there any striking effects around us that are due directly to the Boltzmann constant?
The question says it all.
How can I best convince a non-physicist that the Boltzmann constant describes the world around us?
Are there any striking effects around us that are due directly to the Boltzmann constant?
The short answer to
Are there any striking effects around us that are due directly to the Boltzmann constant?
is that energy and temperature are measured in different units.
If $k_B$ were smaller by a factor 2, then our absolute temperature values (using the kelvin unit) would be larger by a factor of 2 (so that $k_BT$ is unchanged). The change is not in the physics, but in the scale values we use.
As I suggested in the comment, the Boltzmann constant $k_B$ is essentially an conversion factor between energy and temperature for accounting purposes because of the way energy and temperature were historically defined.
I would argue that $k_BT$ (the energy-equivalent of temperature) is more physical than either $k_B$ or $T$. In other words, we might have defined a quantity $\tau=k_BT$ and write all of our equations with $\tau$ (like $PV=N\tau$) and never have to see $k_B$. In fact, using the notion of "thermodynamic-beta" ($\beta=\frac{1}{k_BT}$) we can already write the ideal gas law as $PV=N/\beta$ or maybe $PV\beta=N$.
Furthermore, from the definition of entropy $S=k_B \ln \Omega$, the $k_B$ is just there to give units to the entropy [because of the way energy and temperature have been historically defined]. The physics is in the multiplicity $\Omega$, not in the Boltzmann constant $k_B$.
In natural units (as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_constant#Value_in_different_units ), $k_B$ is set to unity, which effectively swaps out temperature $T$ (in kelvin) for $\tau=k_BT$ (in units of energy).