3

For Quantum-mechanics on a Hilbert-space over the complex numbers, the usual scalar product of two states $\langle \phi | \psi \rangle$ and gives the transition amplitude between the two states. The absolute square of this quantity then gives the probability that a particular value associated with $|\phi \rangle$ can be measured when the system is in state $| \psi \rangle$.

However, when one constructs states over super-numbers (for example fermionic coherent states), those states do have supernumbers as coefficients, and thus the scalar product yields a super-number as well.

Can this super-numbers still be used as a transition-amplitude?

For example, in a 2 state-system: $$ |\theta \rangle = | 0 \rangle - \theta | 1 \rangle \\ $$ then $$ \langle 0 |\theta \rangle = 1 \\ \langle 1 | \theta \rangle = - \theta. $$ How would we proceed from here?

  • The absolute square would be $ \bar{\theta} \theta $, which is grassmann even - or would it be $\theta \theta = 0$?
  • If the square is zero, does that mean that fermionic coherent states essentially are overlapping with the vacuum state?
  • Is the concept of transition probabilities simply not defined for states over super numbers?
  • If so, could it in principle be defined in a consistent way?
Qmechanic
  • 220,844
Quantumwhisp
  • 7,095

1 Answers1

2

In order for the Born rule of a wavefunction or an overlap to produce measurable physical probabilities $\in[0,1]$ of ordinary numbers, all supernumbers must first have been integrated out, cf. e.g. this & this Phys.SE posts.

Qmechanic
  • 220,844