2

Feynman's lost lecture

So at 17:38, 3Blue1Brown states:

We know that once the planet has turned an angle $\theta$ off the horizontal with respect to the sun, that corresponds to walking $\theta$ degrees around our circle in our velocity diagram, since the acceleration vector rotates just as much as the radial vector.

I'm not sure I quite follow the logic here.

Yes, I can see that the acceleration vector rotate just as much as the radius vector since the sun exerts its force along the radius vector. But what I don't understand is how that translate into saying that the when the position of the planet has turned an angle of $\theta$ with respect to the sun, that means that the "that corresponds to walking $\theta$ around our circle in our velocity diagram", and certainly not how that can be derived from the fact that the acceleration vector rotates just as much as the radius vector.

I think specifically, I'm not sure the meaning of this sentence "walking $\theta$ degrees around our circle in our velocity diagram".

jxhyc
  • 121
  • 3

2 Answers2

1

Acceleration is the change in velocity (per unit time). Since the velocity vectors trace out a circle in velocity space, the acceleration vectors are tangent to this circle. Therefore, they are always perpendicular to the 'radii' of the circle, so if the acceleration changes an angle $\theta$, the 'radius' also changes by the same angle.

I've made a few posts before about Feynman's lecture:

In this post, I discuss Feynman's geometric proof. You can see that if the changes in velocity ||$\Delta \boldsymbol{v}$|| are kept constant, they trace out a polygon, which in the limit becomes a circle.

enter image description here

So if ||$\Delta \boldsymbol{v}$|| changes by a constant angle $\Delta\theta$, the radius in yellow also changes by $\Delta\theta$ (see the post for more detail).

enter image description here

In another post I use a similar idea to solve Kepler's problem with ordinary calculus. It is easy to see that

$$ \boldsymbol{a} = -\frac{k}{r^2}\boldsymbol{e}_r = -\frac{k}{h}\dot{\theta}\boldsymbol{e}_r = \frac{k}{h}\dot{\boldsymbol{e}}_\theta = \dot{\boldsymbol{v}}_\text{c}, $$ where $h = r^2\dot{\theta}$ is the magnitude of angular momentum per unit mass, $\boldsymbol{e}_r$ and $\boldsymbol{e}_\theta$ are the orthonormal basis vectors in polar coordinates, and $$ \boldsymbol{v}_\text{c} = \frac{k}{h}\boldsymbol{e}_\theta $$ is a 'circular velocity', corresponding with the radius of the circle in velocity space. Again, since $\boldsymbol{e}_r \perp \boldsymbol{e}_\theta$, $$\boldsymbol{a} \perp \boldsymbol{v}_\text{c}.$$

enter image description here

Pulsar
  • 14,970
0

On the right diagram, there are 4 sections, each section is an equal angle of 15 degrees, so 60 degrees around the orbit.

On the left velocity diagram, it said earlier that the tips of the velocity vectors are equally spaced, so 4 of those sections is a fraction of 4 out of 24 'steps' around the circle or 60 degrees again.

True, the mention of 'acceleration vector' was not helpful on the video.

John Hunter
  • 13,830