3

I'm working on the Eq.(7.57) in Peskin(page 236).

enter image description hereSo I try to verify it with LSZ formula.

According to Eq (7.42)

enter image description here

So $\mathcal{M}(p \rightarrow p)=-Z M^{2}\left(p^{2}\right)$

In this I have two question:

① Consider S=1+iT, why did the "1" vanish?

② Is Eq.(2)->Eq.(3) correct?

Consider Eq (7.22)in Peskin, it seems to lack a free propagator.

Eq.(2)= 1 + (1PI) + (1PI-1PI) + (1PI-1PI-1PI) + ...

Eq.(3)= (1PI) + (1PI-1PI) + (1PI-1PI-1PI) + ...

enter image description here

sky
  • 199

1 Answers1

1
  1. I think that your equality (2)=(3) is not correct. Moreover I am not sure what is the right interpretation of (3) in case of diagrams with exactly 2 exterior legs. Furthermore (4) seems to contradict the Kallen-Lehmann formula (see (7.9) in Peskin-Schroeder book). The latter implies that $$\int d^4x_1d^4x_2 e^{ip_1x_1}e^{-ip_2x_2}\langle\Omega|T\{\phi(x_1)\phi(x_2)\}|\Omega\rangle\approx (2\pi)^4\delta^{(4)}(p_1-p_2)\frac{iZ}{p_1^2-m^2+i\epsilon}.$$ Namely the exact propagator has a pole of first order as $p^2\to m^2$.

  2. Another remark is that as far as I understand, in the Peskin-Schroeder book one particles states are assumed to be stable. That means in particular that $$\langle p_1|S|p_2\rangle=\delta^{(4)}(p_1-p_2).$$ That means that in the decomposition $S=1+iT$ the $1$ term is present, but the $iT$ term vanishes.

Lorenzo B.
  • 562
  • 4
  • 16
MKO
  • 2,349