0

Consider a particle executing 1D simple harmonic oscillation. To formulate Lagrangian, we use $V=(1/2)kx^2$ for potential energy, and via Euler-Lagrange's equation we formulate the equation of motion $F=ma=-kx$.

  1. Now, my 1st question is, if we initially did not know anything about the force, then how could we use $V=(1/2)kx^2$ as potential energy for the system?

  2. My second question is: if we knew the force $F=-kx$, then what makes the sense of using Lagrange's equation? I mean what is the implication of using Lagrange's equation to find the equation of motion?

sid
  • 63

2 Answers2

1

If your objective is to simply obtain the equations of motion for the simple harmonic oscillator in 1d, there is little advantage in using a Lagrangian. However, in more complicated problems, this approach is much more powerful that Newton's law (see for instance this problem).

The Lagrangian is a scalar, which means it does not depend on the coordinate system (although of course its exact form will depend on the coordinate used). This makes the Lagrangian well adapted for problems where it would be otherwise difficult to add vectors. In particular, since kinetic and potential energies are additive, it is easy to construct the Lagrangian for a multi-particle system.

The equations of motion can be obtain from a single function: the Lagrangian. The Lagrangian is also efficient, in the sense that you do not need to consider action-reaction pairs; this makes it easy to handle constraints.

The resulting equations of motions are elegant: through calculus of variation, the solutions to the Euler-Lagrange equations minimize the action integral. The extension of the equations of motion from particles to fields is immediate.

Finally, the Lagrangian formulation is a stepping stone to the Hamiltonian formulation and its extensions (including Hamilton-Jacobi).

ZeroTheHero
  • 49,168
  • 21
  • 71
  • 148
0

As the comment points point out. If we know nothing of the force, we would know nothing of the potential either, and we wouldn't be able to do anything really.

As for 2), why we need the Lagrangian. Unfortunately your example is so trivial that the Lagrangian formulation becomes unnecessarily cumbersome in this case.

The true power of Lagrangian mechanics shines through when the systems become more complicated, such as when there are constraints on the motion or then several particles are interacting.

mpv
  • 5,296