2

(Transferred as a separate question from comments in Scott Aaronson’s gravitational decoherence question) Reversing gravitational decoherence

The modern answer seems to be that they never occur, and that therefore nothing causes them. This leads on (or back) to Everett and MWI. A closely related idea is that there is only one collapse, just as there is only one wave function, but it covers the whole universe, all time and all space.

An older answer, at least sometimes called Copenhagen, is that collapses are merely Bayesian updating, and hence do not occur as physical processes.

A third answer, associated with Wigner and von Neumann himself, is that the observer causes collapses by the act of observation.

GRW suggest that collapses occur gradually, due to a nonlinear modification of the Schrodinger equation.

I do not find these answers satisfactory. See related question, “Can you count collapses?” I am interested in answers that do not modify QM, (unlike GRW), but (like GRW) nevertheless regard collapse as a real physical process that can be observed, and counted.
Can someone provide references to papers that discuss collapses that meet this criterion?
Are there other answers to the collapse question not mentioned above?

Jim Graber
  • 5,817

2 Answers2

2

I think you might find a series of blog posts that I wrote recently useful. They also point to a paper that is available on arxiv and is currently in the review pipeline. See http://aquantumoftheory.wordpress.com

The posts specifically discuss how the collapse postulate with the Born rule can emerge from unitary quantum mechanics without the need of additional postulates.

A.O.Tell
  • 957
1

I've explained this here.

Unitarity is a relative attribute of physical evolution. Outside observers always see evolution of interaction between separate systems as unitary, but when the observer itself belongs to one of the separate systems, they perceive non-unitary projection. This should not be surprising, since the observer is also a quantum system, and because of that, it can become entangled, and become a superposition

lurscher
  • 14,933