Apparently, Aristotle reasoned (without experimentation) that heavier objects must fall to Earth faster than lighter objects. For example, a 1,000 kg ball of iron would fall faster than a 1 kg ball of iron.
Galileo is reputed to have disproved this experimentally by dropping two differently heavy objects from the Tower of Pisa, and they were observed to hit the ground at the same time. Case closed, right?
Well, it suddenly occurred to me this morning that Aristotle was actually correct, and Galileo's experiment was incapable of discerning any difference in arrival times between the two weights he dropped. And I wonder if our measuring devices today could discern the difference in arrival times in this case?
The formula for force due to gravitational acceleration is:
$$F = \frac{Gm_1m_2}{d^2}$$
For both the 1000kg and 1kg masses, the product of them both with the Earth's mass is clearly the Earth's mass, so $F$ will be virtually the same for them both. But if we take the 1000kg mass out to the Moon's orbit, and we stop the moon in its orbit so it stands still with respect to the Earth, the force $F$ will clearly be much larger between the Moon and the Earth than between the 1000kg mass and the Earth.
The result of this is that the Moon and the Earth will meet much faster than the 1000kg mass will meet the Earth.
Am I right, and is Aristotle vindicated, or is there something I'm missing here?