A car accident results in a total loss and personal injury. Should my lawyer handle both or only the personal injury case? I figure that the benefit from the car claim cannot be improved by a lawyer. Let's say insurance is willing to pay 10K. And at the very high end a lawyer might get 15K for the same car. But then subtracting the lawyer's percentage (typically %33 to %40) I may end up with even less than the insurance was willing to pay directly.
In such a case is there an advantage to me by mixing personal injury with the total loss? What language should I use with the insurance company and the lawyer to keep the two claims separate?
I have heard that as soon as you accept insurance company offer for the car you are also accepting their offer for the personal injury. Is this true? How do I make sure that I am just accepting the car loss coverage, and not the personal injury offer?
If the two are to be combined is it reasonable to limit lawyer's percentage on the car loss to the amount above the insurance company offer?