3

A quantum map on a $d$-dimensional space has the general representation: $$ \mathcal{S}(\rho)=\sum_{\alpha,\beta}^{d^2}\chi_{\alpha\beta}\Gamma_{\alpha}\rho \Gamma_{\beta}^{\dagger}, $$ where $\chi$ is the $d^2\times d^2$ process matrix, which is positive semidefinite and trace preserving.

On the other hand, the (unnormalized) maximally entangled bipartite state between a quantum system $S$ and an ancilla system $A$ is $|\psi\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^d|k\rangle_A|k\rangle_S$ , where $\{|k\rangle\}_{k=1}^d$ represents an orthonormal basis. For a quantum process $\mathcal{E}$ acting only on the system $S$ of $|\psi\rangle$, the output state is given by $$ \Upsilon_{\mathcal{E}}=(\mathcal{I} \otimes \mathcal{E})(|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|)=\sum_{k, l=1}^d|k\rangle\langle l| \otimes \mathcal{E}(|k\rangle\langle l|), $$ which is called the Choi matrix of the process $\mathcal{E}$.

Since they can all represent quantum process, so why this paper of process tomography uses $\chi$ matrix?

FDGod
  • 2,901
  • 2
  • 6
  • 31
karry
  • 689
  • 4
  • 14

2 Answers2

2

The two descriptions are entirely equivalent. It doesn't matter which you use when, it's just a case of using whichever description you personally find to be mathematically the most convenient.

DaftWullie
  • 62,671
  • 4
  • 55
  • 140
1

This is just a comment, but it's too long for a comment, so writing as an answer. As I haven't read the paper you are asking about, I cannot answer as to particularly why that paper is using the process matrix. Will update my answer later if I get time.


A map $\mathcal{E}$ is completely positive if and only if the Choi matrix $\Upsilon_\mathcal{E}$ is a positive matrix.

Equivalently, the super-operator $\mathcal{E}$, acting on any operator $A$ can be written as $$ \mathcal{E}(A) = \sum_{\alpha,\beta}^{d^2}\chi_{\alpha\beta}\Gamma_{\alpha}A \Gamma_{\beta}^{\dagger} \,,$$ where $\chi$ is a positive matrix in some operator basis $\{\Gamma_{\alpha}\}$. However, if your $\mathcal{E}$ is not a CPTP map, then you will not be able to write the above equation with positive $\chi$.

Both the Choi matrix and the process matrix accomplish the same thing, which is to verify the complete positivity of your map/process $\mathcal{E}$, i.e., $\mathcal{E}$ correspond to some valid physical quantum process or not$^1$.

Generally, if you have $\mathcal{E}$ given, it's easier to calculate the Choi matrix to verify the complete positivity of $\mathcal{E}$.


Fun fact: $\Upsilon_\mathcal{E}$ and $\chi$ are related by just a unitary transformation.
1: If you need some intuition behind this statement, my this answer to another question would be helpful.

FDGod
  • 2,901
  • 2
  • 6
  • 31