Hubble's Law says that galaxies are moving away from Earth at speeds proportional to their distance. The resolution of Olbers' Paradox is that the universe is of finite age.
However, Hubble's observations of farther galaxies are of then younger galaxies. As with Olbers' Paradox, we are now seeing those galaxies as they were and not as they are. Farther younger galaxies had greater accelerations. Older closer galaxies now (or closer to now) have lower accelerations. Galaxies are negative accelerating.
Yet whenever Hubble's observation of farther galaxies with greater accelerations is brought up it's as hand wavy evidence of an expanding universe (but ignoring their age). Still, if nearer galaxies are accelerating less and we can see negative acceleration, isn't this evidence of energy dissipation? Yes, I know that energy isn't conserved on observable universe scales. I'm just wondering if this is the evidence. Moreover, if galaxies are negative accelerating and energy is dissipating then what's the evidence for dark energy (the 2011 Nobel Physics Prize notwithstanding)?