Rigid bodies are known to be modelled using mass, momentum, tensor of inertia, angular momentum, position of a center of mass and some representation of orientation in space.
If we apply a force vector to some point of a rigid body, such that the axis of the force vector would pass through the center of mass, them we should only affect its momentum, and not angular momentum. Otherwise, torque is involved, and we also affect the angular momentum.
Some sources, for example https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/a/115553 claim that in such cases, we apply the torque independently of the force.
Given that the kinetic energy of a rigid body is a sum of its linear kinetic energy, and rotational kinetic energy, I wonder how can this be reconciled with energy conservation?
(I've found that the question was touched briefly in the comments to https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/16568/72748 but no satisfying explanation was given)