I noticed that in Newtonian fluids, stresses are proportional to deformation, whether caused by normal stress or shear stress, with the constant ratio being the viscosity coefficient. I don’t understand how this constant ratio arises, given that the nature of the stresses is different.
For example, if we consider two components of the stress tensor:
The $\textbf{shear component}$ is given by the relation:
$\tau_{xy} = \mu \cdot \gamma_{xy}$
where the $\textbf{strain}$ $\gamma_{xy}$ (shear strain) is given by:
$\gamma_{xy} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}$
The $\textbf{normal component}$ is given by the relation:
$\sigma_{xx} = \mu \cdot \epsilon_{xx}$
where the $\textbf{strain}$ $\epsilon_{xx}$ (normal strain) is given by:
$\epsilon_{xx} = 2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}$
From these two relations, we observe that despite the difference in the physical nature of the components (shear stress caused by transverse velocity gradients, and normal stress caused by stretching or compression), both are proportional to the rate of deformation with the same coefficient, which is the viscosity.
In contrast, in solids, the proportionality constants differ depending on the nature of the stress. For example:
Tensile stress is proportional to strain via $\textbf{Young’s modulus}$ $E$, as given by the relation: $\sigma = E \cdot \epsilon$
Shear stress is proportional to shear strain via the $\textbf{shear modulus}$ $G$, as given by the relation: $\tau = G \cdot \gamma$
Clearly, $E$ is not equal to $G$.
$\textbf{My question}$: What is different in fluids compared to solids that allows us to deal with a single proportionality constant regardless of the nature of the stress?