You need more details. The general metric for a spherically symmetric solution is
$$\mathrm{d}s^2 = - e^{2\phi(t,r)}\mathrm{d}t^2 + e^{2\psi(t,r)}\mathrm{d}r^2 + r^2 \mathrm{d}\Omega^2$$
and the functions $\phi$ and $\psi$ are, in principle, arbitrary (meaning they need to be fixed by solving the EFE). This means there is a lot of freedom in the solution and it is difficult to give a complete response. In particular, the time-dependence makes the problem quite difficult.
If you also impose that the solution is stationary, then the metric simplifies to
$$\mathrm{d}s^2 = - e^{2\phi(r)}\mathrm{d}t^2 + e^{2\psi(r)}\mathrm{d}r^2 + r^2 \mathrm{d}\Omega^2,$$
which is actually much easier. The most general solutions is the anisotropic generalization of the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff solution. The TOV solution goes a step further when imposing symmetries and requests that the tangential and radial pressures are all equal, which simplifies the problem slightly more. Without this assumption, the functions $\phi$ and $\psi$ can still be freely specified (or obtained by solving the EFE).
These solutions are often used as models for relativistic stars. They can differ considerably from Schwarzschild in the interior (the exterior is always Schwarzschild due to Birkhoff's theorem). For instance, there is no need for a horizon, one can have negative masses without having singularities, etc.
The case of a homogeneous star (constant energy density) is one of the few cases that one can solve analytically. This is sometimes referred to as the Schwarzschild star (Schwarzschild worked on this solution soon after the original black hole solution) and is discussed in many books in general relativity. For example, Wald's book.