4

In quantum field theory, It’s often said that the interacting annihilation operator (defined by the Klein Gordon inner product between the interacting field and a plane wave) behaves like the free annihilation operator in the limit of asymptotic times. In other words,

$a(k)|k_{W}\rangle = |\Omega\rangle$ as $t \rightarrow \infty$

Where $|k_{W}\rangle$ is a wave packet formed by smearing the eigenstates of the momentum operator.

What’s the justification for this?

E. Anikin
  • 1,123

2 Answers2

4

Under suitable assumptions, such results are established via Haag-Ruelle-type theorems, see ref. 1 for the mathematically precise statement and proof.

In more down-to-earth terms, this is best taken as a working hypothesis rather than a theorem. The usual way to justify this is by using the common trick of turning-off of coupling constants. Namely, we take the interaction to be $e^{-\epsilon|t|}H_\text{int}$ for some small $\epsilon$. Now, at large times the states become free and the claim trivially follows. See e.g. Gell-Mann and Low theorem for an example of this philosophy.

See also ref 2.

References:

  1. Bogolubov, Anatoly A. Logunov, A.I. Oksak, I. Todorov - General principles of quantum field theory, Part IV (specifically, chapter 12).

  2. Ticciati, R. - Quantum Field Theory for Mathematicians, section 10.4.

0

The interacting annihilation operator is defined by

$$a(k) = \int d^4x \, e^{ikx} \phi(x)$$

where $\phi(x)$ is the interacting field operator and $k$ is a four-momentum. The Klein-Gordon inner product between $\phi(x)$ and a plane wave $e^{-ikx}$ is given by

$$\langle \phi(x), e^{-ikx} \rangle = i \int_\Sigma d\Sigma^\mu \left( \phi^*(x) \partial_\mu e^{-ikx} - e^{-ikx} \partial_\mu \phi^*(x) \right)$$

where $\Sigma$ is a spacelike hypersurface. The interacting annihilation operator $a(k)$ can be shown to satisfy the commutation relation

$$[a(k), a^\dagger(k')] = (2\pi)^3 2\omega_k \delta^{(3)}(\vec{k} - \vec{k}')$$

where $\omega_k = \sqrt{\vec{k}^2 + m^2}$ and $m$ is the mass of the particle.

The claim that $a(k)|k_W\rangle = |\Omega\rangle$ as $t \to \infty$ means that in the asymptotic future, the interacting state $|k_W\rangle$, which is a wave packet formed by smearing the eigenstates of the momentum operator, becomes indistinguishable from the vacuum state $|\Omega\rangle$. This implies that the particle with momentum $k$ has been annihilated by the interaction.

The justification for this claim is based on the assumption that the interaction Hamiltonian $H_I$ vanishes sufficiently fast as $t \to \pm \infty$. This allows one to define the in and out states as

$$|k_W\rangle_{\pm} = U_0^\dagger(\pm\infty) U(\pm\infty) |kW\rangle$$

where $U(t)$ is the time evolution operator for the full Hamiltonian $H = H_0 + H_I$ and $U_0(t)$ is the time evolution operator for the free Hamiltonian $H_0$. The in and out states are eigenstates of the free Hamiltonian with momentum $k$, i.e.

$$H_0 |k_W\rangle_{\pm} = E_k |k_W\rangle_{\pm}$$

where $E_k = \omega_k$. The asymptotic condition then states that

$$U_0(t) |k_W\rangle_{\pm} - U(t) |k_W\rangle = 0$$

as $t \to \pm \infty$. This means that in the far past or future, the interacting state evolves like a free state with momentum $k$. In particular, as $t \to +\infty$, we have

$$U_0(t) |k_W\rangle_{+} - U(t) |k_W\rangle = 0$$

Using the definition of $|k_W\rangle_{+}$, this implies that

$$U_0(t) U_0^\dagger(+\infty) U(+\infty) |k_W\rangle - U(t) |k_W\rangle = 0$$

Taking the limit as $t \to +\infty$, we get

$$U_0^\dagger(+\infty) U(+\infty) |k_W\rangle - |\Omega\rangle = 0$$

where we have used the fact that $U_0(+\infty)|k_W\rangle = |\Omega\rangle$ since it is a free state with positive energy. Multiplying both sides by $a(k)$, we obtain

$$a(k) U_0^\dagger(+\infty) U(+\infty) |k_W\rangle - a(k)|\Omega\rangle = 0$$

Since $a(k)|\Omega\rangle = 0$, we finally get

$$a(k)|k_W\rangle_{+} = a(k) U_0^\dagger(+\infty) U(+\infty) |k_W\rangle = |\Omega\rangle$$

as desired.

Olandelie
  • 198