If I am in a high speed train, and I am sitting there, and I see a hummingbird flying $ 30 km/h $ relative to me towards the head of the train.
We all know, the scenario above is 100% possible by physics. I can measure it flying away at $ 30 km/h $.
However, by Galileo, we can't really tell what speed the train is going. No matter what speed the train is going, we can say it is going at $ 200 km/h $, or $ 600 km/h $, or close to the speed of light. It just depends on what the train is moving relative to.
So if I consider relative to a certain point in the universe, the train is going near the speed of light, let's say $ c - 20 km / h $ where $ c $ is the speed of light, and by the fact that the humming bird is moving faster than the train, then the hummingbird is going at a speed of, as @Dan suggested, using the velocity addition formula, $ v $, where $ v $ is getting closer to $ c $, but cannot exceed $ c $. For simplicity, let's say $ v $ is something like $ c - 2km/h $ or $ c - 3km/h $, just a speed that is greater than $ c - 20 km / h $ but less than $ c $.
So from my perspective, the hummingbird is $ 30 km/h $ faster than me, but by relativity, the hummingbird is no more than $ 20 km / h $ faster than me.
So doesn't this have a contradiction? What should be adjusted in the above statements?