Forget about wormhole-stabilizing fields and energies. Wheeler and Fuller's paper describe the expansion and subsequent collapse of a created wormhole. Essentially they describe a created wormhole as first growing to a maximum size, while also expanding all the space around it, and then collapsing whilst contracting all of space around it. (The paper is well worth the read)
From a Ricci flow perspective this makes sense. What happens however when space is expanding with time also (as measured in our own universe)? It would seem reasonable (from a purely qualitative view) to suppose that such an expanding metric would counteract or even halt the contracting space and collapse of wormholes (or other nontrivial topologies) at particular sizes (Given the Hubble value, probably VERY small).
Can anyone weigh in here? I'd like to tackle the problem from a more quantitative point of view.
This scheme might be best defined for a closed space, as the scale parameter is then uniquely defined. I couldn't help but find intriguing, the possibility of linking cosmological parameters to something that would probably end up being very small.
Before any input, I was thinking an approach utilizing Ricci solitons might be appropriate.