An electron is described often enough as a cloud. It has the quantum property called spin which does not mean actual spinning. Regardless of that property, if it is something with size that occupies volume, can this thing rotate? I imagine that in a rotating frame of reference, it must appear to rotate but I suspect I am wrong about this somehow.
5 Answers
Electrons are quantum mechanical entities, and in the mainframe standard model of particle physics point particles, no dimensions, with the quantum numbers and mass shown in the table.
An electron is described often enough as a cloud.
This statement is wrong, any wave model at the quantum level is a probability wave .
The "cloud" statement is a description of electrons in quantum mechanical bound states about a nucleus, see for example the measured electron positions for a hydrogen atom, they resemble a cloud
but they are its locations, not sequential tracks, but orbitals.
Since no orbits , one cannot set up a system to see if it rotates, although it has the spin rotational quantum number, which can be measured in experiments to have a specific direction, so in that general sense it does rotate.
Spin quantum numbers have been assigned to elementary particles and composites of elementary particles in order to keep angular momentum conservation at the quantum level also, and this is continually validated up to now.
- 236,935
Electrons in QM don't have a determined volume. They are considered as waves. When you measure the position of it, you find a point where the wave collapses. Then, your electron becomes a point, which has no volume. So, usually, when the wave has not collapsed, it doesn't make sense to describe a volume as we don't know the position (it could be at every point of space). As you can not define a volume, it makes no sense to talk about rotation as it needs an axis and a certain volume. A point can not rotate physically.
- 857
It is a misconception to think an electron is physically some sort of cloud. Indeed, the probability density for measuring it at some point in spacetime is not a point, but that is not something material, but only mathematical formalism.
Thus, asking if the cloud can rotate is like asking if a Gaussian or a sine function can rotate.
- 864
In nonrelativistic particle-based QM, spin has to be put in by hand, and makes little sense.
But in quantum field theory, spin is actual spinning of the field. See Hans C. Ohanian, "What is spin?", Am. J. Phys. 54 (6), June 1986, online here. Here's an excerpt from the abstract:
According to the prevailing belief, the spin of the electron [...] is a mysterious internal angular momentum for which no concrete physical picture is available, and for which there is no classical analog. However [...] it can be shown that the spin may be regarded as an angular momentum generated by a circulating flow of energy in the wave field of the electron. [...] Furthermore, a comparison between calculations of angular momentum in the Dirac and electromagnetic fields shows that the spin of the electron is entirely analogous to the angular momentum carried by a classical circularly polarized wave.
So electrons do rotate, more or less.
- 29,129
A electron has no known inner structure so it's a point as far as we're concerned. A rotation of a point can't be observed so a point can't rotate.
- 15,416
- 1,277
