Schwartz' QFT textbook states on page 116 that:
Since $\partial_\mu A^\mu=0$ is a Lorentz-invariant condition, it has to remove a complete representation, which with one degree of freedom can only be the spin-0 component.
I don't understand this. He claims that in $4=3\oplus 1$, we removed the 1, instead of changing the 3 to a 2. Why is that?
More context:
This chapter talks about how to construct a Lagrangian for a massive spin-1 particle. We use the four-vector $A^\mu$, but a naive guess for the Lagrangian like $$ \mathcal L = -\frac{1}{2} \partial^\mu A^\nu \partial_\mu A_\nu + \frac{m^2}{2}A_\mu A^\mu\tag{8.17}$$ leads to a set of four uncoupled equations of motion, i.e. we decomposed the four degrees of freedom in $A^\mu$ into $4=1\oplus 1\oplus 1\oplus 1$. With a term like $\partial_\mu A^\mu$ in the Lagrangian, we force $A^\mu$ to transform as a vector, i.e. the decomposition $4=3\oplus 1$ is guaranteed. He then claims that (see the quotation) that the gauge condition removes the "1" part, instead of reducing the "3" part to "2".