6

I'm trying to understand why SL$(2, \mathbb{C})$ double cover SO${}^{+}$(1, 3). I have read the proof in the book Zee "Group theory" (pag 453) and the wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_group, they use very similar reasoning.

In the wikipedia is stated the following:

"These maps are surjective, and kernel of either map is the two element subgroup ±I. By the first isomorphism theorem, the quotient group PSL(2,C) = SL(2,C) / {±I} is isomorphic to SO+(1,3)."

To use the "first isomorphism theorem" first of all you have to provide a surjective homomorphism

$\phi:$ SL$(2, \mathbb{C})\to $SO$^{+}(1, 3)$

However, both in the book and in the wikipedia they doesn't explain how is such homomorphism, and it's not proved that is surjective. They have only proved that the action of SL$(2, \mathbb{C})$ on the Minkowski space-time preserves the Minkowski metric.

Qmechanic
  • 220,844
Andrea
  • 826

1 Answers1

8

First of all, we have to find a homomorphism of the form

$$\varphi:\mathrm{Sl}(2,\mathbb{C})\to\mathrm{O}(1,3),$$

which is what you are asking for, if I understand correctly. For this, we first of all define the set of all hermitian $2\times 2$ matrices by

$$\mathbb{H}:=\{M\in\mathbb{C}^{2\times 2}\mid M=M^{\dagger}\}.$$

This space is isomorphic to the Minkowski space $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}$ via the map

$$\mathbb{R}^{1,3}\to\mathbb{H},(t,x,y,z)\mapsto\begin{pmatrix}t+z&x-iy\\ x+iy&t-z\end{pmatrix}.$$

Using this, we define a map

$$\varphi:\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})\to \mathbb{H}^{\mathbb{H}},X \mapsto (M\mapsto XMX^{\dagger}),$$

where $\mathbb{H}^{\mathbb{H}}$ denotes the set of all maps from $\mathbb{H}$ to $\mathbb{H}$. Now, observe that this map preserves the determinant, i.e.

$$\mathrm{det}(XMX^{\dagger})=\mathrm{det}(X)\mathrm{det}(M)\mathrm{det}(X^{\dagger})=\mathrm{det}(M).$$

But now, using the map $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}\to\mathbb{H}$ desribed above, you see that $\mathrm{det}$ in $\mathbb{H}$ is one and the same as the norm squared in $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}$, i.e.

$$\Vert (t,x,y,z)\Vert_{1,3}^{2}=t^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}=\mathrm{det}\begin{pmatrix}t+z&x-iy\\ x+iy&t-z\end{pmatrix}$$

and hence, the map $\varphi$ maps elements of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ into orthogonal maps from $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}$ to $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}$, which means that we can view $\varphi$ as a map of the form

$$\varphi:\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})\to \mathrm{O}(1,3).$$

Furthermore, since this map is continuous, it maps the identity component to the identity component, which means that we have that $\varphi(\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}))\subset\mathrm{SO}^{+}(1,3)$. In the end, we have found a map of the form

$$\varphi:\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})\to \mathrm{SO}^{+}(1,3).$$

What is left to show is surjectivity. For this, you just have to check that all basis elements of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(1,3)$ are obtained by some element of $\mathrm{Sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$. As an example, going through all the steps of the definition, you see that

$$\varphi\begin{pmatrix}e^{i\varphi/2}&0\\0&e^{-i\varphi/2}\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0&0\\0&\cos\varphi&\sin\varphi&0\\0&-\sin\varphi&\cos\varphi&0\\0&0&0&1\end{pmatrix}.$$

It is not too hard to construct the others.

To show that the map $\varphi$ is a double cover, we have to use the isomorphism theorem, which states that for a homomorphism $f:G\to H$ of groups we have that

$$\mathrm{im}(f)\cong G/\mathrm{ker}(f).$$

In the case $f$ is surjective, it follows that

$$H\cong G/\mathrm{ker}(f).$$

An element $X\in\mathrm{ker}(\varphi)\subset\mathrm{Sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$ has to satisfy $MX=XM$ for all hermitian $M\in\mathbb{C}^{2\times 2}$ and the only possibility for this is that $M\in \{1,-1\}$. To sum up, we have found the following isomorphism of groups:

$$\mathrm{SO}^{+}(1,3)\cong\mathrm{Sl}(2,\mathbb{C})/\{\pm 1\},$$

which concludes the proof.

By the way, this is exactly the same proof as for the claim that $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ douple covers $\mathrm{SO}(3)$, which you can find in many textbooks (I guess), when you change some definitions accordingly.

G. Blaickner
  • 1,524