The citation from the paper does not seem based on any theoretical or experimental evidence. The relation between structure factor and radial distribution function is basically a 3-D Fourier transform. This implies that if the radial distribution function, as acknowledged by the author of the paper,
provides information about the overall particle microstructure in a
stationary sense
in no way a simple spatial Fourier transform may introduce
information related to the dynamics of the particle microstructures.
Information on dynamics requires time correlation functions, either in real or in reciprocal space. The time-independent correlation functions embodied in the radial distribution function or in the structure factors are not enough to say anything about dynamics, being related to the time correlation functions at the same time.
The presence of large values of the structure factor at small wavenumber is, in general, a signal of the presence of large clusters, but without dynamic information: a fluid close to its critical point or a two-component glass close to the spinodal decomposition may show large values of $S({\bf k})$ at small wavenumbers even if the corresponding typical times are different by many orders of magnitude.