1

I searched Physics Stack Exchange and google and could only find wordy articles on this, but what I am after is the actual mathematical calculation. I took General Relativity in Physics, and I tried calculating the radius of the visible universe myself, but my calculation is not quite right. What am I missing? My calculation is as follows:

Take a photon emitted 13.8 billion years go. The distance it must have been from us, at the moment it should be

$R_{0}=c\times t_{now}=3\times 10^{8}m/s\times13.8 \mbox{ billion years}=13.6 \mbox{ billion lightyears}$

We of course need to account for the expansion of space over the intercal of 13.8 billion year. The Hubble constant is roughly equal to

$H_{0}=73.8 \mbox{km/s/Mpc}=2.3917462 \times10^{-18} \mbox{/s}$

The metric for the expansion of the universe is:

$ds^{2}=-c^{2}dt^{2}+a(t)^{2}dr^2$

with approximately

$a(t)=a_{0}e^{\frac{t}{t_{H}}}$

where $t_{H}=\frac{1}{H_{0}}=4.181046 \times 10^{17}s$

For convenience I choose $a_{0}=1$ so that the coordinate $r$ of the location where the photon was emitted is given by:

$r=R_{0}=13.6 \mbox{ billion lightyears}$

we next have that:

$a_{now}=1 \times e^{\frac{13.8 \mbox{billion years}}{13.249217 \mbox{billion years}}}=2.834$

Now consider, again the the point in space that the photon was emitted from. It will be at the same coordinate $r=13.6 \mbox{ billion lightyears}$, but because of the expansion of space, its distance from us now should be

$R=a_{now} \times r = 2.834 \times 13.8 \mbox{ billion lightyears} = 39.1 \mbox{ billion lightyears} $

Obviously though, the actual radius of the visible universe is believed to be about 46.5 billion lightyears, whereas I am calculating 39.1 billion lightyears, so I am under-calculating by 6.4 billion lightyears.

My questions are therefore: Where am I going wrong? Is there a paper that presents the actual detailed calculation? I tried googling this like crazy, but could not find the actual calculation.

Rory Cornish
  • 1,117

1 Answers1

1

The Hubble parameter is not a constant. It was larger at earlier epochs; therefore $\tau_H$ was smaller in the past.

You are also confused about definitions of $a$. In particular, $a_{\rm now} = a_0 = 1$.

The scale factor does not get bigger as $\exp(Ht)$ in a universe where matter is a significant component of the energy density.

Some details about how to calculate it correctly are given in https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/374164/43351 and https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/57538/43351

ProfRob
  • 141,325