2

In several textbooks and papers, like this one for example, a claim like the following is made:

The EDM of a system $\vec{d}$ must be parallel (or antiparallel) to the average angular momentum of the system $\hbar\langle\vec{J}\rangle$.

What is the motivation for making such an assertion? It seems not to make much sense if you consider, for example, two opposite electric charges held apart by a short, rigid massless rod (the usual classical picture of an electric dipole). The system can have zero angular momentum, but still has a nonzero electric dipole moment.

Qmechanic
  • 220,844

1 Answers1

0

They are probably talking about the quantum mechanical expectation value, which has to be along the angular momentum vector. If the angular momentum is zero, the expectation value of any vector would be zero.