Could be a photon moving in an expanding universe be thought of as an ant moving along an elastic rope fixed at the upper end on a cieling that is streching due to a constant mass at its bottom end. So even the ant has a specific velocity regarding the elastic rope he could have different velocities regarding the end point hanging on the cieling because the points on the rope themselves are moving?
2 Answers
Could be a photon moving in an expanding universe be thought of as an ant moving along an elastic rope fixed at the upper end on a ceiling that is stretching due to a constant mass at its bottom end.
The point where the elastic rope meets with the ceiling can be thought of as an inertial point. I believe for this reason this analogy is not a good one to describe the speed of light. There's no general inertial frame in cosmology. All inertial frames are defined locally. In your analogy, it seems like the universe has a general inertial reference frame, which is not true.
I simply ask if two points with a comoving distance have a time for a photon to reach one from the other defined just as distance divided with c or the velocity is not just c but should be a function of space expansion...
Well you can describe the comoving distance ($d_c$) as a function of $t$, $a(t)$ or $z$. In order to find how much time took for light to travel between two comoving objects you can divide comoving distance by $c$.
The conformal time defined as
$$\eta = \frac{d_p}{c}$$
where $$d_p = c\int_{t_e}^{t_0} \frac{dt}{a(t)}$$
Thus $$\eta =\int_{t_e}^{t_0} \frac{dt}{a(t)}$$
PS: If you want to write the above equations in terms of $z$ you can do it like this
$$\eta=\int \frac {dt} {a}=\int\frac {da} {a\dot{a}}=\int\frac {da} {a^2H}$$ and we can write $$H(z)=H_0E(z)$$ $$E(z)=\sqrt{\Omega_{\Lambda}+\Omega_m(1+z)^3+\Omega_r(1+z)^4+\Omega_{\kappa}(1+z)^2}$$
so we have,
$$\eta=\int\frac {da} {a^2H_0E(z)}$$
and $dz=-da/a^2$ so we can write,
$$\eta=-H_0^{-1}\int_z^0\frac {dz} {E(z)}$$
$$\eta=H_0^{-1}\int_0^{z}\frac {dz} {E(z)}$$
- 3,188
The analogy fails because the ant has different velocities relative to different observers, while according to Special Relativity photons always have the same velocity in free space, for all observers.
A closer analogy might be that the ant looks longer or shorter to different observers at different points on the elastic.
- 7,578