In the Schwarzschild metric
$$ds^2 = - \left(1-\frac{2M}{r} \right) dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{1-\frac{2M}{r} }+ r^2 d\Omega^2. $$
Is it safe to call $M$ the mass of the source of curvature? Or should I just say its the mass of the central object?
In the Schwarzschild metric
$$ds^2 = - \left(1-\frac{2M}{r} \right) dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{1-\frac{2M}{r} }+ r^2 d\Omega^2. $$
Is it safe to call $M$ the mass of the source of curvature? Or should I just say its the mass of the central object?
$M$ is a parameter of the metric. To identify it as a mass, we need to define what we mean by masses in GR.
For that we use the ADM formalism: Wiki: ADM mass
Schwarzschild metric was presented some where around 1916,(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_metric ) you can pretty much be sure that "mass"(M) was considered as "mass" at that time. It's just the mass of the black hole.