Is it correct to say that if you hit the speed of light you would travel at the same speed as a single image in time would? And if you were to (if possible) travel faster than light, you would theoretically be travelling faster than than the images that have already come by. It is a known fact that when we are looking at stars billions of light years away we are essentially looking into the past. If you were travelling faster than the speed of light (without the argument of relativity) would your perspective turn to something like an image looking down two mirrors adjacent to one another but moving through each image- what we perceive as time but going backward. I am no mathematician or physicist just an average person pretty much no math and physics education, but a vivid imagination. Degrading comments are unnecessary I'm just curious.
Asked
Active
Viewed 50 times
