2

On page 34 of A. Zee's book QFT in a Nutshell, he states:

I expect you to remember the concept of polarization from your course on electromagnetism. A massive spin 1 particle has three degrees of polarization for the obvious reason that in its rest frame its spin vector can point in three different directions.

  1. I understand that the spin of a spin-1 particle is a 3-vector, because it is the fundamental representation of $SO(3)$.
  2. I also know from classical ED that the polarization of light can be quantitatively described using a 3-vector.

But why is this the same? Why is the second implication obvious:

$$ \text{Spin}\,1 \implies \text{Spin} \in \mathbb{R}^3 \implies \text{Polarization} \in \mathbb{R}^3 \, ? $$

DanielSank
  • 25,766
Bass
  • 1,527

0 Answers0