I have about 2M EUR of savings, in all kind of supports (the choice of the supports was random or historic - not driven by any reasonable financial analysis).
Since I have no interest in managing this money myself, I am considering leaving this to a private bank.
There are roughly two kind of private banks in France: the ones which are "standalone" and oriented towards real fortunes (e.g. Rothschild) and ones which are attached to generally available banks (e.g. BNP Paribas).
The main difference to my untrained eye is in the entry levels: 1M+ for the former, 250-500k for the latter.
Is it more interesting to aim for the "entry level client" in the first kind of banks, or rather "mid level client" in the second one?
Both will certainly offer a similar gain (about 4% I guess) with, hopefully, a similar level of risk (please correct me if I am wrong). I do not expect miracles and would be worried if someone suggested some.
My concern is rather on
- the quality of the relationship: being at the bottom of the customer ladder vs being a bit higher, if it helps
- the investment portfolio, which may be different in the first case (oriented towards more wealthy clients) than in the second (oriented towards clients with less capacities, which mean some investments are off the table because, say, they require a larger entry capital not available to these customers, and therefore not offered in the portfolio at all)
Or maybe it does not matter much?