68

I live in Quebec, and my rent cheque was stolen from my landlord as they travelled to the bank to deposit it. They've asked me to stop payment on the cheque, and provide them with a new one. The stolen cheque was not cashed, but I stopped payment, and closed the account as the cheque had personal and direct deposit info on it.

My question - am I obligated to provide them with another rent cheque for that same month, even though it's not my fault it was stolen?

In the interest of avoiding conflict, I am going to pay, but I'm just curious as to whether I am contractually obligated to.

SQB
  • 907
  • 7
  • 17
lrey
  • 887
  • 1
  • 6
  • 5

11 Answers11

231

Yes, absolutely! You are obligated to pay your rent, and you haven't done so yet. Since this was your landlord's issue and not your own, if your bank charges you a stop payment fee, it would be reasonable for you to request that the landlord allows you to discount the rent by that amount when you rewrite the check.

TTT
  • 47,380
  • 7
  • 101
  • 152
104

Your obligation wasn't to write a check...it was to pay your landlord. And you haven't actually paid until money has gone from you to the landlord. So you're still obligated to pay.

(You might not have to write another check. Any method of payment the landlord accepts will work. But if they will only accept a check, then check it is.)

cHao
  • 3,219
  • 3
  • 15
  • 13
43

Yes, you are still obligated to pay the rent.

I don't know Canadian law, but in the US, your obligation to pay a debt is generally relieved when control of the money passes to the other person.

In a simple case, suppose you paid the landlord with cash. If you gave him the cash, and then as he was on his way to the bank to deposit it, or on his way to the mall to spend it, or whatever, he was robbed, then that is his problem and not yours. You gave him the money, he accepted the money, the debt is paid.

On the other hand, if you were robbed on your way to the landlord's office and the thief took the money before you gave it to the landlord, then it is your problem. The landlord never received the money.

There are "hard cases" that end up in court, like what if as you were in the process of handing him the money, a thief burst into the room and robbed you?

If the thief had stolen the check and managed to cash it before you could put a stop on it ... you'd have to talk to a lawyer. I'd think that as the check was in the landlord's possession when it was stolen, the landlord would have to take the loss. But I'm not a lawyer.

Jay
  • 22,959
  • 1
  • 33
  • 74
34

The Régie du Logement is the government agency responsible for setting regulations regarding leases in Québec. They are very clear that paying the rent in full is your #1 obligation as a tenant.

When paying by cheque, the rent is generally deemed paid when it has been honoured by the tenant’s financial institution, according to the Régie link above. In your case, that has not happened, and you still must pay the landlord.

Before you deduct anything from your rent payment, make sure that you have your landlord’s approval, given how much the page above emphasizes paying the rent in full.

You can also call the Régie or go visit them in person if you have additional questions. Their site has a lot of other FAQs available regarding obligations of the lessor and lessee.

Scott Dudley
  • 556
  • 3
  • 6
14

You voided the check, so now you still need to pay the rent.

This is an area of law called "Mitigation of damages" -- everyone has a duty to prevent loss. Mainly, this shows up when you break a lease. You lease to December but on March 1, give notice for April 1. If you tell him ASAP, and he must make fair effort to find a new tenant ASAP. Once the other tenant starts paying, you're off the hook.

So under mitigation of damages, when the landlord told you he'd lost your check, he had a legal obligation to tell you to stop-payment ASAP, and you had a legal obligation to do so. If either of you failed to do so, then the money loss would be that person's. If he failed to notify you and the thief got your rent, you don't owe any more. If he notified you and you failed to stop payment, you would pay double rent, first to the thief, then to the landlord.

If you lose your paycheck, you can ask for a reprint

Many people presume you are a greedy, selfish individual looking to take advantage. I don't presume that. I worry that you have a wrong idea about the financial system, and you think it swings both ways.

Test question: If you dropped your paycheck in a mud puddle, do you now need to suffer 2 weeks' loss of income?

Answer: NOPE! Just like the landlord did: contact payroll immediately, tell them the check was lost, and ask for a replacement check.

Harper - Reinstate Monica
  • 59,009
  • 10
  • 94
  • 199
7

You put a stop payment on the check. At your landlords request true, but that is really irrelevant. You have made that payment null and void. You haven't paid your rent.

If the money had already been taken out of your account, you might justifiably say that you paid, and the fact that they lost the check was their problem. But that's not what happened.

Suppose that the thief is caught and the check returned to your landlord would you expect him to have the right (disregarding any fees that it might incur) to ask ask you to talk to your bank and remove the stop payment? If yes, why would you think he doesn't have the right to ask for a new check?

As a lesson learned matter, you should have talked to your landlord about the stop payment fee before issuing the stop paymnet. Now I would suggest asking him if he wants to reimburse you for that or for you to take it out of the payment (assumed sale tactic), but be prepared for him to reject both options and make you pay in full. At this point you really don't have any leverage, you owe your rent in full and have repudiated your attemt at payment.

In short, you need to pay your rent, and preferably as quickly as possible since you are now probably over due.

jmoreno
  • 1,603
  • 10
  • 16
6

Of course you are, since the rent cheque wasn't cashed. (Even if it was cashed by the thief, you still might owe him rent, but in that case I'd talk to a lawyer.)

What you can/should do is tell the landlord that you're going to deduct the cost of stopping payment from this month's rent cheque.

RonJohn
  • 50,786
  • 10
  • 107
  • 170
4

Yes you have to pay, because you have not yet paid the money to the landlord. This is the reason checks were invented. So that if they are stolen or lost, it is NOT THE SAME as if the money was stolen or lost.

Tb.
  • 41
  • 1
4

You have to pay the rent, but you wouldn't have to cover expenses arising form you landlord's mishap. For example, if the cheque you gave to them were cashed, and you wouldn't be able to reverse the payment, you'd have a strong argument for not paying a second time*. If voiding the cheque costed you money, you could ask that cost to be deduced from the rent you owe. Since you didn't lose any money, you still owe your landlord the full amount.

(*) As an important note, you should write your cheques in a way that it would be impossible to cash them if they are lost/stolen. This is usually ensured by writing the full name of the recipient on the cheque. If you don't do this, you may be held responsible for paying the original cheque and paying your landlord.

Dmitry Grigoryev
  • 1,507
  • 9
  • 19
1

Yes, obviously you still owe the rent for that month.

quid
  • 49,074
  • 11
  • 101
  • 161
0

Yes, you still owe the rent if the rent was not deducted from your checking account balance. If the landlord had cashed the check, the money had been removed from your account balance, and THEN the landlord lost the cash, you would not owe the landlord a second check as your cancelled check would serve as proof of payment in any resulting court case.

That said, the landlord should owe you for any documentable expenses that you incurred as a result of replacing the check he lost. Documentable means expenses and fees directly related to replacing the check for which you have written, third party proof. So if you incurred bank fees related to stopping the check or issuing a second money order, those should be refunded by the landlord. Do NOT unilaterally deduct these fees from the new rent check without prior agreement (preferably written - an email or text from your landlord confirming the agreed deduction would suffice) as failure to pay the entire rent amount is often the legal equivalent of not paying anything at all and could lead to an eviction proceeding in some jurisdictions. If there is some question about the landlord's willingness to pay for the fees, issue a check for the full amount of the rent and handle the fees separately. Document everything in writing. You can always recover the fees in small claims court if it comes to that.

LA2000
  • 11