In a comment I asked if you included taxes, charges for each trade, and the amount you missed by frequently exiting the market. You asked for clarification regarding exiting the market.
In the data sheet you showed that you went long stretches where you sold all your shares a company because it went up 2%, and then the next day reinvested all your money back into the same company.
Sometimes doing that was a good thing:
- Purchased 2830.00 of AAPL at price $0.51 on 2004-06-24. Total Invested: $1456.20. Remaining Budget: 0.50. Total Budget: 1456.71
- Sold 2830.00 of AAPL at price $0.52 on 2004-06-28. Total Invested: $0.00. Remaining Budget: $1485.83. Total Budget: $1485.83
- Purchased 3017.00 of AAPL at price $0.49 on 2004-06-29. Total Invested: $1485.72. Remaining Budget: 0.12. Total Budget: 1485.83
- Sold 3017.00 of AAPL at price $0.50 on 2004-06-29. Total Invested: $0.00. Remaining Budget: $1515.55. Total Budget: $1515.55
- Purchased 3031.00 of AAPL at price $0.50 on 2004-06-30. Total Invested: $1515.42. Remaining Budget: 0.13. Total Budget: 1515.55
- Sold 3031.00 of AAPL at price $0.51 on 2004-07-15. Total Invested: $0.00. Remaining Budget: $1545.86. Total Budget: $1545.86
You bought at $0.51, and several transactions later you sold at $0.51 but because you didn't own own the shares when the small drop occurred from $0.52 to $0.49 you made almost $90.00. That worked out for you.
Sometimes you missed a jump in price:
- Purchased 2909.00 of AAPL at price $0.62 on 2004-10-07. Total Invested: $1810.88. Remaining Budget: 0.28. Total Budget: 1811.16
- Sold 2909.00 of AAPL at price $0.63 on 2004-10-14. Total Invested: $0.00. Remaining Budget: $1847.38. Total Budget: $1847.38
- Purchased 2680.00 of AAPL at price $0.69 on 2004-10-15. Total Invested: $1846.93. Remaining Budget: 0.46. Total Budget: 1847.38
- Sold 2680.00 of AAPL at price $0.70 on 2004-10-18. Total Invested: $0.00. Remaining Budget: $1884.32. Total Budget: $1884.32
- Purchased 2551.00 of AAPL at price $0.74 on 2004-10-19. Total Invested: $1884.16. Remaining Budget: 0.16. Total Budget: 1884.32
- Sold 2551.00 of AAPL at price $0.75 on 2004-10-27. Total Invested: $0.00. Remaining Budget: $1922.00. Total Budget: $1922.00
You missed two jumps in this sequence of trades: $0.63 to $0.69 and again from $0.70 to $0.74. If you had simply bought at $0.62 and sold at $0.75 you would have made more money. Of course you don't know this before the fact.
Looking just at your first data sheet you bought and sold nothing but AAPL from:
- Purchased 3040.00 of AAPL at price $0.33 on 2004-01-05. Total Invested: $999.90. Remaining Budget: 0.10. Total Budget: 1000.00
until:
- Sold 2462.00 of AAPL at price $0.81 on 2004-10-29. Total Invested: $0.00. Remaining Budget: $1999.63. Total Budget: $1999.63
You essentially doubled your money. Good job. But....
If you had simply bought at $0.33 and sold at $0.81 you would have turned the $1000 into $2462. You would have made $460 more.
This reminds me of an earlier question:
Is it true that, "just ten trading days represent 63 per cent of the returns of the past 50 years"?
from my answer to that other question:
I did find that a similar phrase in an article on the motley fool website
Time in the market, versus time out of the market
J.P. Morgan Asset Management's 2019 Retirement Guide shows the impact
that pulling out of the market has on a portfolio. Looking back over
the 20-year period from Jan. 1, 1999, to Dec. 31, 2018, if you missed
the top 10 best days in the stock market, your overall return was cut
in half. That's a significant difference for only 10 days over two
decades!
The JP Morgan study can be found on their website. Page 41 of the report has the information.
The constant in and out of the market could mean you miss a significant chunk of the growth.