I recently took a vehicle (2008 Sedona Automatic Transmission) in to a transmission place on the advice of a basic auto repair guy, because the metal grinding noise we were hearing, he believed, was coming from the transmission.
At the transmission place, they guy said, no, it turns out it's the engine.
After further investigation he told me the engine would have to be replaced. This effectively totals the car.
That's all okay. Here's my question.
I don't remember what the transmission/engine guy said word for word, but what I took away from his description was a mental image of the piston in the engine literally hitting or scraping against the side of the little chamber it sits in in the engine. That, I thought I understood, was the source of the metal grinding sound (according to his description), and the damage already done by this (and the damage that caused it, whatever that was) necessitated a complete replacement.
However on relaying this mental image to someone casually who generally "knows about cars," he laughed and said "that's not how that works." There was no further elaboration.
I'm prepared to believe I either misunderstood the engine/transmission guy, or he massively oversimplified it in describing it to me.
But my question is: If I say to you "my engine was making a metal grinding sound, and it turns out it was a result of the piston making contact with parts of the engine it was not supposed to be making contact with," is that an automatic "heh no that's not how that works" from you as well? If so, what do you think was the likely true story behind whatever oversimplification I heard or misheard?