It'd be prudent
A minor in Oregon is limited in the choice of jobs they can fulfill, and employers usually need certification to employ them at all. Also, even if they would be a freelancer, they can under no situation be employed for more than a set number of hours.
Further, Minors may void contracts.
However, not disclosing that the contract is with a minor, would allow the client to void the contract as soon as the fact is disclosed after signing: the fact that the service was offered from a minor is a substantial fact that alters how the contract would be evaluated by the client: not disclosing the fact that the offerer is a minor can be misrepresentation - which gives the client the right to void the contract.
However, there's also the problem if the child implied or actively misrepresented they were of age: in that case, they might not be allowed to void the contract, as the adult relied on the minor's misrepresentation and the minor is forced to perform their part of the contract - or at least they have to give back the proceeds they had gained from the contract if they void it under the retained-benefit doctrine.1
To shield from such, disclosure of age can at times be required. Also note, that typical internet contract language includes that the party represents of age.
1 - Larry A. DiMatteo, Deconstructing the Myth of the
“Infancy Law Doctrine”: From Incapacity to Accountability, 21 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 481, 496–97
(1994)