31

I was trying to sort a stack of movies chronologically. Most boxes contain a copyright notice e.g. “(c) 1985 Acme Pictures LLC“. However, Walt Disney Pictures consistently omits the year, e.g. “(c) Disney”. Why does Disney do things differently? Alternatively, why does the rest of the industry devote precious box space to the year in addition to the full name?

Since a counter example has been found, here are the titles I observed (all VHS copies):

  • Beauty and the Beast “(c) The Walt Disney Company”
  • Bedknobs and Broomsticks “(c) The Walt Disney Company”
  • Homeward Bound “(c) Buena Vista Pictures Distribution, Inc.”
  • Sleeping Beauty “(c) Disney Enterprises, Inc.”
  • The Santa Clause “(c) The Walt Disney Company”
Spencer Joplin
  • 413
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5

3 Answers3

60

For works released after 1989, Copyright notices don't have any legal consequences in the United States. They are just a friendly reminder of who created the work and that they take their copyrights seriously. But those notices are not required anymore to enforce your copyrights on the works you created. If you have proof that you own the copyright on something and when it was created, and if it's still within the term limits, then you can take legal actions against people who violate your copyright.

Disney has a history of repeated worldwide lobbying for extending the expiration durations in copyright laws in order to avoid any of their classic cartoons from falling out of copyright protection. So it could be that they try to intentionally muddy the waters and make it harder to find out which of their works expire when. That way people are less sure about what Disney works are and are not in the public domain, making it more risky to use them. But that's just my theory.

Philipp
  • 7,954
  • 27
  • 43
12

Just to be clear - Disney makes lots and lots of money off its characters, movies yes but its characters are the cash cow.

It is very very likely that one of Disney's strategies to not give up these rights to characters is to revisit them continuously. By not supplying a date in their movies they are not giving reasonable expectations of usage at some further date.

(the idea that the largest film company in the world is trying to obscure dates on multimillion dollar movies, no that's not it, they know you can find the dates. Anyone with a basic web search can find these dates.)

blankip
  • 1,127
  • 7
  • 14
0

It's a marketing decision. They don't want to label their product "Old", "Very Old" and "Before your parents were born"

In the food industry, these are hard decisions that need a lot of thought. Supermarkets require dates for stock rotation. Some food items are known to last 10 or 20 years on the shelf. If you put very long-dated labels on your food, people will think it's full of "chemicals". If you put short dated labels on your food, it will be thrown out prematurely.

Some people really do look at the date on food and movies. They will not bother with "old" movies. WD gets considerable value from their back catalog, and have been re-releasing titles for years. Decades. Since before you were born. They don't wish to put dates on their product.

david
  • 848
  • 3
  • 9