I am a beneficiary of a family trust, being forced to sign an indemnification agreement, similar to the situation described in Why California codified "A trustee may not require a beneficiary to relieve the trustee of liability..."?
The trustee is Bank of America in Florida - unfortunately not in California.
The one-sided 'agreement' includes the statement that I was not induced to sign it by improper conduct of the Trustee. Does this statement have any legal value? What if I was forced by improper conduct to state that I was not forced by improper conduct?
We are 13 beneficiaries all living in Denmark. This makes the legal process quite troublesome. I guess our best remedy in case of excessive administration costs or other problems would be to publicize the case?
