4

I got let go today but my company (based in NYC) still owes me money, about $12,000 after tax, roughly. Shortly after letting me go, the company asked me to sign a general release. This, in theory, would release them from having to pay me my salary. This seems to me to be an extremely morally suspect move.

Am I right in thinking this? How should I proceed? I am asking law friends to recommend some employment lawyers, but other than this, can I do anything else? I want to claim unemployment ASAP and start working elsewhere ASAP, but I obviously cannot afford to sign a general release and let go of my claim to unpaid salary. Any advice is greatly appreciated. Please let me know if there are any clarifying questions.

This is related to this question on Personal Finance StackExchange and this question on Law StackExchange.

Scott Skiles
  • 366
  • 2
  • 10

1 Answers1

6

How should I proceed? I am asking law friends to recommend some employment lawyers, but other than this, can I do anything else?

You definitely don't need an employment lawyer for this. From a legal standpoint, the matter is very simple: If you grant their request (whether by signing or otherwise expressing your acceptance), you would be waiving any remedies currently available to you for their breach of contract.

The company's attempt to override its contract with you is quite naive, but the company can always (and evidently does) try to get away with its liability nonetheless. I would not be surprised if the company subsequently tries harder to intimidate you, but that does not change your legal position & merits unless you sign the waiver the company is pursuing.

Asking for your post-termination availability reinforces the notion of company's poor planning and subpar management.

Iñaki Viggers
  • 45,677
  • 4
  • 72
  • 96