I understand that in the UK the police can lie to you about the facts of the case during questioning, things like...
- we have witnesses
- your partner grassed you up
- we found your DNA at the scene of the crime.
- the victim died this now a murder enquiry.
But can they lie about the legal process itself? examples
- we can hold you for 3 days without charge.
- you only get a lawyer after the first day of questioning.
- the crime carries a mandatory life sentence.
- your (young) child will have to fend for themselves for the next 3 days, whilst we hold you. We don't have to tell social services.
- we'll put you in a cell with 'Barry the Butcher' and tell him you're a pedophile.
- we don't need a warrant.
- We think you're a terrorist, we've got a deal with the Americans and we can have you flown out to Guantanamo Bay without a trial.
Just interested in the UK - This questions seems to be already answered for USA. For clarity, I'm interested in police deliberately lying to obtain evidence, not genuine mistakes on obscure points of the law .
UPDATE for clarity - I'm interested in any differences between lying about the facts of the case, and lying about how the law is applied. This isn't a question about what police can actually do to you in custody, it's about what lies they can (or can't) tell to obtain a suspects co-operation.
I know that the UK police can't actually ship suspects to Guantanamo bay, but can they tell a suspect that they will? I know that suspects have to be released or charged after 24 hours, but can they tell the suspect something else?
Consider this scenario. The Police arrest a suspect by the book, read him his rights correctly, the suspect (foolishly) declines the services of a solicitor, then asks the arresting officer "how long can you hold me?" the officer responds "seven days". Has the officer broken the law at this point by lying?