We see so often in pro sports how a high quality player is transferred to another team and some time later it emerges that this player has a chronic condition affecting their performance - the same injury that put off the selling team from offering them a new contract.
In plain language, the new team were sold a lame horse.
Obviously, the new team spent a day or two making their own medical examination before agreeing the transfer and signing off on the multi-million fee involved. Yet, without really knowing the nature of any physiological weaknesses, it would be well-nigh impossible for a new set of specialists to find a flaw in an otherwise 100% healthy elite athlete.
Is the caveat emptor principle with property also the situation with pro sportsman transfer ?
Or does the huge scale of investment afford a buying team any measure of "discovery" on the athlete's previous medical history, examinations and specialist opinion ?
 
     
    