In Brazil, a Supreme Court Justice recently ordered the freezing of finances for SpaceX's Starlink, an entity owned by Elon Musk, due to non-compliance by another Musk-owned business, X (formerly Twitter).
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/29/elon-musk-brazil-judge-x-ban-starlink-freeze.html
I wonder if the same thing can happen in US.
- Under what circumstances could US courts freeze the finances of one business due to the actions of another associated business?
- Are there any notable US cases where similar actions were taken?
I am looking for insights into the legal principles and precedents that govern such actions in the US.
EDIT: This question is different from a seemingly duplicate question.
What is the legal basis for Brazil freezing starlink assets due to twitter/x fines?
My question asks for answers in the context of U.S. I don't care about the legal basis for Brazil but concerned whether the same thing applies in U.S.