Why doesnt sudo /dev/null > /var/log/syslog and sudo > /var/log/syslog work, while sudo rm /var/log/syslog works?!
- 1,275
- 591
6 Answers
There are two main problems.
One problem is that /dev/null isn't a command, so running sudo /dev/null can't succeed. You need sudo [a command]. In this case, you probably want sudo cat /dev/null.
The other problem is that > separates things into a full command on the left and a file on the right, so the full command on the left is sudo cat /dev/null, and sudo's job is now done once it runs cat /dev/null.
That means that the > is running as your user, not under sudo. Your user doesn't have permission to write to /var/log/syslog, so this will fail.
You need some way to run the entire line cat /dev/null > /var/log/syslog under sudo. Well, > isn't a command or anything. It's something the shell handles, so you need to have a shell handle that redirection symbol properly. You can do that with sh's -c option: sh -c 'cat /dev/null > /var/log/syslog'.
Now that you have everything together as one command, you can have sudo run the entire thing:
sudo sh -c 'cat /dev/null > /var/log/syslog'
- 5,323
- 3,058
The command you are thinking of is probably
> /var/log/syslog
Nothing else is needed. In bash and other shells, the > will immediately truncate the file, emptying it. However, when you run this:
sudo /dev/null > /var/log/syslog
The system is attempting to run /dev/null as a command and you will get this error:
sudo: /dev/null: command not found
Note, however, that despite this, /var/log/syslog has actually been emptied because, as I said above, the > is enough, no command is necessary.
- 104,119
truncate: The truncation process basically removes all the contents of the file. It does not remove the file itself, but it leaves it on the disk as a zero byte file.
Clear ALL Content of Syslog with:
sudo truncate -s 0 /var/log/syslog
- 41
Another way to do this is
sudo tee </dev/null /var/log/syslog
Or if you prefer a useless use of cat:
cat /dev/null | sudo tee /var/log/syslog
- 111
Yesterday I noticed a 14GB syslog file in my 22.04 (jammy) 6.2.0-34-generic then I landed in here. I found a different solution from the man pages and it worked. So wanted to share whoever will encounter same issue -not a problem but a preference- with the late versions of Ubuntu.
I have just edit /etc/logrotate.conf file, tweaked a couple of lines. weekly to keep the logs for 2 weeks only and size 3G to limit them under 3GB and compress.
# /etc/logrotate.conf
# see "man logrotate" for details
rotate log files weekly
weekly
keep 4 weeks worth of backlogs
rotate 2
uncomment this if you want your log files compressed
compress
size
size 3G
And the result is syslog file is divided into a couple of multiple syslog files, which have no more than 40MB, and made ~80MB total now. (amounts depend on the machine's logging history).
- 1