4

On Ubuntu server 16.04, with only X installed and no window manager, I can still launch Kodi without the --standalone switch. For example from a local console:

xinit kodi -- vtx

This leads me to ask: what is the difference between "kodi" and "kodi --standalone" if I can still launch kodi without calling the "kodi-standalone" or "--standalone" switch?

I understand kodi is for launching with a window manager, and kodi-standalone is a script that launches kodi with the --standalone switch.

My question is why, since I have with no WM installed, do both kodi and kodi-standalone (or kodi --standalone) launch just fine?

Vishnu N K
  • 615
sunshine
  • 76

1 Answers1

1

Accoding to user FernetMenta over at the Kodi forums:

The option standalone has nothing to do with a window manager (docs/wiki is wrong). With standalone Kodi is i.e. allowed to power the system down and users can change refresh rate in settings dialog.

Running Kodi without a window manager may work but is not a supported and tested scenario.

Community
  • 1
sunshine
  • 76