We proof the statement by induction over  ,  So suppose that
,  So suppose that
 and set
 
and set
 .
Let
.
Let
 and
 and   with
with
 be the relevant row. By definition, we have
be the relevant row. By definition, we have
 .
Due to the induction hypothesis, we have
.
Due to the induction hypothesis, we have
 for
for
 , 
because two rows coincide in these cases. Therefore,
, 
because two rows coincide in these cases. Therefore,
-   
where
 .
The matrices
.
The matrices
 and
 and   consist in the same rows, however, the row
consist in the same rows, however, the row
 is in
is in  the
 the  -th row and in
-th row and in  the
 the  -th row. All other rows occur in both matrices in the same order. By swapping altogether
-th row. All other rows occur in both matrices in the same order. By swapping altogether  times adjacent rows, we can transform
 times adjacent rows, we can transform  into
 into  . Due to the induction hypothesis and
fact,
their determinants are related by the factor
. Due to the induction hypothesis and
fact,
their determinants are related by the factor  , thus
, thus
 .
Using this, we obtain
.
Using this, we obtain
