Introduction
Inequalities are an essential tool for proving central statements in function theory. Since
does not have a complete/total order, one must rely on the magnitude of functions for estimations.
Inequality for the Sum of Real and Imaginary Parts - IRI
Let
be a piecewise continuous function with
,
, and
, then we have:

Learning Task - IRI
Prove the IRI inequality. The proof is done by decomposing into real part function and imaginary part function, linearity of the integral, and applying the triangle inequality.
Inequality for the Absolute Value in the Integrand - AVI
Let
be a piecewise continuous function, then we have:

Proof - AVI
The proof is done by a case distinction with:
- (AVI-1)

- (AVI-2)

Case - (AVI-2)
The integral
is a complex number with
, for which we have with
:
- :=}\cdot \beta =\alpha \cdot \beta }

Case - (AVI-2) - Step 1
Since
, we have by the linearity of the integral:

Case - (AVI-2) - Step 3
Let
and
be a piecewise continuous function with
,
, and
, then we have by the linearity of the integral:

Case - (AVI-2) - Step 4
Since
holds, we have by the above calculation from Step 3 for the real part:

Case - (AVI-2) - Step 5
The following real part estimate against the absolute value of a complex number 

for
is now applied to the integrand of the above integral
.
Case - (AVI-2) - Step 6
The following estimate is obtained analogously to Step 5 by the linearity of the integral

Case - (AVI-2) - Step 7
Since
holds, we have in total the desired estimate:

Inequality - Length of Integration Path - LIP
Let :[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {C} }
be an integration path and
be a function on the trace of
(i.e.
). Then we have:

where
is the length of the integral.
Proof - LIP
By using the above estimate for the absolute value of the integrand
and the UG-BI inequality, we obtain:

Inequality for Estimation Over Integration Paths
Let :[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {C} }
be an Integration path and
a continuous function on the trace of
(
). Then, the following holds:

Here,
is the length of the integral.